From: eobiont on 12 Apr 2006 10:16 I have been running unattended Windows XP installations for years, and they have been running fine. Recently I made a change to the process that resulted in an interesting error. I got a new Lenovo Thinkpad T60 that has has very little memory available for DOS. When loading the Intel network card, I was getting a dreaded error 8 "Not enough memory" and the workstation service failed to start. I looked all over the internet for a solution to this problem and happened upon a site that suggested changing the System.INI entry preferredredir=full to preferredredir=basic. This is the only change I made to my process, and it worked! The change allows the computer to map to my network drive and run WINNT.EXE to begin the Windows installation process. The first and second yellow progess bar stages complete. The drive converts from FAT32 to NTFS, and the Install GUI stage starts. Immediately, the error message comes up saying "The file 'asms' on Windows XP Professional Service Pack2 CD is needed." I try this on another computer, one that was working before the switch in System.ini, and get the same error. If I switch the system.ini file back to preferredredir=full, the problem goes away, and the installation works fine. That won't work on the Thinkpad though, because if I switch the system.ini file back, I get the not enough memory error back at the DOS stage. I don't know what the difference between basic and full is for the preferredredir value, or why it might affect the unattended install. Does anyone have any insight into this problem? I think if I copy the files in that folder down by hand, before running the installer, it will also work. Why does the installer copy the files when preferredredir=full and not when preferredredir=basic?
From: eobiont on 12 Apr 2006 13:58 It turns out that the files in ASMS aren't ever copied down, regardless of the value of preferredredir. However, when the preferredredir is set to basic, Windows installer must need to get a file from this directory that wasn;t copied down. If the preferredredir is set to full, it must not need the file(s). The only subfolders of I386 that are copied down are the $OEM$, the svcpack, the CMPNENTS, and the System32. I remember there is a text file that controls what files are copied during the inital unattend setup. I will try to modify that file and see if I can get the ASMS folder to copy as part of the installation process. eobiont(a)yahoo.com wrote: > I have been running unattended Windows XP installations for years, and > they have been running fine. > > Recently I made a change to the process that resulted in an interesting > error. > > I got a new Lenovo Thinkpad T60 that has has very little memory > available for DOS. When loading the Intel network card, I was getting > a dreaded error 8 "Not enough memory" and the workstation service > failed to start. > > I looked all over the internet for a solution to this problem and > happened upon a site that suggested changing the System.INI entry > preferredredir=full to preferredredir=basic. > > This is the only change I made to my process, and it worked! The > change allows the computer to map to my network drive and run WINNT.EXE > to begin the Windows installation process. The first and second yellow > progess bar stages complete. The drive converts from FAT32 to NTFS, > and the Install GUI stage starts. Immediately, the error message comes > up saying "The file 'asms' on Windows XP Professional Service Pack2 CD > is needed." > > I try this on another computer, one that was working before the switch > in System.ini, and get the same error. If I switch the system.ini file > back to preferredredir=full, the problem goes away, and the > installation works fine. That won't work on the Thinkpad though, > because if I switch the system.ini file back, I get the not enough > memory error back at the DOS stage. > > I don't know what the difference between basic and full is for the > preferredredir value, or why it might affect the unattended install. > Does anyone have any insight into this problem? > > I think if I copy the files in that folder down by hand, before running > the installer, it will also work. > > Why does the installer copy the files when preferredredir=full and not > when preferredredir=basic?
From: eobiont on 12 Apr 2006 15:33 OK, so I added ASMS to the [OptionalSrcDirs] of the DOSNET.INF file in my Windows XP Admin share. Now the ASMS error message is gone, but I get a new error message, "An error has been encountered that prevents Setup from continuing" Untanslateable Message, Win32LastError is 14001. Dang.
From: John on 13 Apr 2006 08:33 Windows XP SP2 has a bug when running WINNT.exe in DOS You should use the 32 exe : Winnt32.exe within WinPE. REgards John <eobiont(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1144870435.249693.216550(a)j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > OK, so I added ASMS to the [OptionalSrcDirs] of the DOSNET.INF file in > my Windows XP Admin share. > > Now the ASMS error message is gone, but I get a new error message, "An > error has been encountered that prevents Setup from continuing" > Untanslateable Message, Win32LastError is 14001. > > Dang. >
From: eobiont on 13 Apr 2006 11:52 I would run WinPE if I could, but we have a number of machines that do not have CD-ROM drives. I really need to have a floppy method for installing Windows XP. I think a better solution would be to not purchase Thinkpads. They are nice laptops, but I have not had much luck with their tech support. Since this is the only computer I've run into with the low memory problem, I think the answer is to just not support that laptop. If Lenovo would suppy a network boot floppy, I would be all set. John wrote: > Windows XP SP2 has a bug when running WINNT.exe in DOS > > You should use the 32 exe : Winnt32.exe within WinPE. > > REgards > > John > > > > <eobiont(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:1144870435.249693.216550(a)j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > OK, so I added ASMS to the [OptionalSrcDirs] of the DOSNET.INF file in > > my Windows XP Admin share. > > > > Now the ASMS error message is gone, but I get a new error message, "An > > error has been encountered that prevents Setup from continuing" > > Untanslateable Message, Win32LastError is 14001. > > > > Dang. > >
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Setup cannot copy the file driver.cab during xp installation!?!?!? Next: ZTI and SQL 2005 |