Unicode API
in [Visual Basic]
|
Prev: System Timer Callback?
Next: Any thoughts? Application error .data not place into memory because of an I/O error
From: Tom Shelton on 3 Aug 2010 17:43 Mike Williams pretended : > "Tom Shelton" <tom_shelton(a)comcast.invalid> wrote in message > news:i3a0gl$gqs$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > >> Well duh... if it was exactly the same as the A version >> then it was wrong. If you are going to use the unicode >> version, declare the lpszClass and lpszWindow parameters >> as Longs and use StrPtr to pass the address of the string >> variables... Alternately, use a typelibe declared version. > > Alternately? Why would he want to keep swapping between the two different > methods? Why not simply use StrPtr or alternatively use a typlelib version? > Surely that would make more sense than to keep swapping around? > > Mike LOL... I meant alternatively... love those typos though :) -- Tom Shelton
From: Mike Williams on 3 Aug 2010 18:58 "Tom Shelton" <tom_shelton(a)comcast.invalid> wrote in message news:i3a2ho$4a6$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> Mike Williams said : >> Alternately? Why would he want to keep swapping between >> the two different methods? Why not simply use StrPtr or >> alternatively use a typlelib version? Surely that would make >> more sense than to keep swapping around? > > LOL... I meant alternatively... love those typos though :) Yes, I know you meant alternatively. Common sense told me that. In fact that was the point I was rather subtly making. Common sense. People who always take things literally, as I deliberately did then for illustration purposes, are generally not very smart, such as people who insist, as you have yourself done many times in the past, that the microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion group is for all versions of VB, including the imposter, simply because the group has "vb" in its name. Common sense, which is what some people around here seem to be short of, would tell any sensible person that Microsoft, on whose server the group exists, definitely intended that group to be used for versions of VB up to version 6 (in other words, Classic VB) when they purposely and deliberately created a brand new and different newsgroup for their brand new and different dotnet product and when they ran it concurrently with the VB6 group. Common sense tells you that. If you take things literally, even when common sense tells you otherwise, then you are not very smart. Mike
From: Tom Shelton on 3 Aug 2010 19:15 on 8/3/2010, Mike Williams supposed : > "Tom Shelton" <tom_shelton(a)comcast.invalid> wrote in message > news:i3a2ho$4a6$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> Mike Williams said : >>> Alternately? Why would he want to keep swapping between >>> the two different methods? Why not simply use StrPtr or >>> alternatively use a typlelib version? Surely that would make >>> more sense than to keep swapping around? >> >> LOL... I meant alternatively... love those typos though :) > > Yes, I know you meant alternatively. Common sense told me that. In fact that > was the point I was rather subtly making. Common sense. People who always > take things literally, as I deliberately did then for illustration purposes, > are generally not very smart, such as people who insist, as you have yourself > done many times in the past, that the microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion > group is for all versions of VB, including the imposter, simply because the > group has "vb" in its name. > No... I have not insisted that... I insist that comp.lang.basic.visual.misc is for all versions of VB - because of it's charter. Get it right. -- Tom Shelton
From: Mike Williams on 4 Aug 2010 04:34 "Tom Shelton" <tom_shelton(a)comcast.invalid> wrote in message news:i3a7us$ojh$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> on 8/3/2010, Mike Williams supposed : >> People who always take things literally, as I deliberately >> did then for illustration purposes, are generally not very >> smart, such as people who insist, as you have yourself done many times in >> the past, that the >> microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion group is for all >> versions of VB, including the imposter, simply because >> the group has "vb" in its name. > > No... I have not insisted that... > But you /have/ been infesting the microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion group with your evangelistic dotnet rubbish for quite some time, which amounts to much the same thing. Your lack of common sense is showing again. > I insist that comp.lang.basic.visual.misc is for all > versions of VB - because of it's charter. Get it right. So, taking that in the context in which you said it, I can logically assume that you do agree that the microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb group is /not/ for the VB.Nxt imposter. Well, at least that's something. That's one troll out of the way in the microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb group. Thank you for that. It is a good start. Now we can forget your own evangelistic dotnet outpourings on this group because you will not be spewing them any more. That's good. Just a few more trolls to go and we will be well on the way to having a group here that is entirely free of dotnet trolls. Thank you once again. Now I think I shall do what I had already mentioned, and leave the comp.lang.basic.visual.misc group to yourself and to anyone else who wishes to use it (unless and until its charter is changed of course) and I shall post solely on this microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb group that you have effectively agreed to stop trolling. Once again, let me thank you for agreeing to stop trolling this group. Mike
From: Mike Williams on 4 Aug 2010 05:49
"Mike Williams" <Mike(a)WhiskyAndCoke.com> wrote in message news:i3b8lr$a1m$1(a)speranza.aioe.org... > So, taking that in the context in which you said it, I can logically > assume that you do agree that the microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb > group is /not/ for the VB.Nxt imposter. Actually I mentioned the wrong group there a number of times due to a copy and paste error. But then of course common sense would have told you what I actually meant. However, for the record, here it all is again, this time with the correct group names: > [Tom Shelton] No... I have not insisted that... But you /have/ been infesting the microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion group with your evangelistic dotnet rubbish for quite some time, which amounts to much the same thing. Your lack of common sense is showing again. > [Tom Shelton] I insist that comp.lang.basic.visual.misc > is for all versions of VB - because of it's charter. So, taking that in the context in which you said it, I can logically assume that you do agree that the microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion group is /not/ for the VB.Nxt imposter. Well, at least that's something. That's one troll out of the way in the microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion group. Thank you for that. It is a good start. Now we can forget your own evangelistic dotnet outpourings in this group because you will not be spewing them any more. That's good. Just a few more trolls to go and we will be well on the way to having a group here that is entirely free of dotnet trolls. Thank you once again. Now I think I shall do what I had already mentioned, and leave the comp.lang.basic.visual.misc group to yourself and to anyone else who wishes to use it (unless and until its charter is changed of course) and I shall post solely on this microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion group that you have effectively agreed to stop trolling. Once again, let me thank you for agreeing to stop trolling this group. Mike |