Prev: Time in the distance
Next: Foundations of financial management 13e stanley block, geoffrey hirt, bartley test bank
From: Jacko on 20 Jul 2010 13:45
> No head gobshite enter lingo.
tend'ter lineger-gro, whatch batan da(rt) ting ting thing ma be yin'
who da shofook sf da'n timidajination of woleness?

It's simple as I said, but not perfect in the exo, and not perfect in
the entro, but solid pon t'entry security. What be I care Move relates
clooseded 9clod tie pee mistake corlect), induce?
From: Robert L. Oldershaw on 20 Jul 2010 19:45
On Jul 20, 1:45 pm, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> > No head gobshite enter lingo.
>
> tend'ter lineger-gro, whatch batan da(rt) ting ting thing ma be yin'
-------------------------------------------------------

Recommend reboot
From: eric gisse on 20 Jul 2010 21:18
Robert L. Oldershaw wrote:

> On Jul 20, 12:13 am, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dance, puppet. Keep doing exactly as I predict.
> -----------------------------------
>
> Morning Woofy,
>
> There is an unpleasant surprise waiting for you at
> sci.physics.research.

Why is seeing your stuff reposted to SPR an 'unpleasant surprise'? The post
is reasonable. Unfortunately the author is not, as evidenced by your
unwillingness to support your many statements of supposed fact.

>
> Oh, that's right. It's a site for physicists and you are a "barker".
>
> Back to sleep, then. Perchance to dream of chasing squirrels.

From: Robert L. Oldershaw on 20 Jul 2010 23:41
On Jul 20, 9:18 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Why is seeing your stuff reposted to SPR an 'unpleasant surprise'? The post
> is reasonable. Unfortunately the author is not,...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Out of curiosity, have you ever started a thread at SPR?

If so, when was the most recent?

Date/Title?
From: eric gisse on 21 Jul 2010 00:24
Robert L. Oldershaw wrote:

> On Jul 20, 9:18 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Why is seeing your stuff reposted to SPR an 'unpleasant surprise'? The
>> post is reasonable. Unfortunately the author is not,...
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Out of curiosity, have you ever started a thread at SPR?

About as frequently as I start regular threads on sci.physics and
sci.physics.relativity.

>
> If so, when was the most recent?
>
> Date/Title?

Do you have trouble with groups.google.com, Robert?

To address your broader point, I don't really see the point in consulting
the insane, stupid, and clueless about my interests.

Unlike most people here, I can read technical literature for comprehension.
I do so on a daily basis, as I need something to fill my bus commute beyond
music and staring vacantly into space.

For example, I've been parsing through some of the publications from the
WMAP team on the 7 year data analysis. Komatsu, et.al., and Bennett, et.al.
have written some interesting work.

I could write about what I find interesting but it'll fall on deaf ears. The
blithering morons on sci.physics and sci.physics.relativity who literally
_struggle_ with grasping classical mechanics (hi colp, Androcles, Henry
Wilson, the seto, etc...) have nothing useful to say.

I spent a few trips working through a paper by Garafalo who argues that AGNs
are powered near extremal black holes rotating in the opposite direction WRT
the accretion disk. I waited a long time for that paper. I've found some
things I think are straight up _wrong_ in that paper, but I don't even
pretend to engage the illusion that anyone here would have useful commentary
on the matter.

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Time in the distance
Next: Foundations of financial management 13e stanley block, geoffrey hirt, bartley test bank