From: Meat Plow on
On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:05:21 +0000, GregS ǝʇoɹʍ:

> n article <O9idnSsjYas_aprRnZ2dnUVZ_qCdnZ2d(a)mchsi.com>, "William R.
> Walsh" <newsgroups1(a)idontwantjunqueemail.walshcomptech.com> wrote:
>>Hello all...
>>
>>I recently dug up an old JC Penney MCS 2230 integrated stereo, and I'd
>>like to get the turntable going again. (Despite the source, it's a
>>pretty nice stereo system...the radio tuner works well, it seems to have
>>about a 40Wx2 output power rating (which seems reasonable, having looked
>>at the internals), the cassette deck is a partial logic design with the
>>ability to skip ahead 1, 2 or 3 songs and the turntable itself is a
>>linear tracking type.)
>>
>>Anyway, before I stored it, the turntable was in need of a new belt. I
>>set the belt aside and now it seems to be gone. I could have sworn that
>>I read about how to determine an unknown belt size in the FAQ, but I
>>could not find it just now. As best I remember, a string was used and
>>placed around all the components driven by the belt, after which a
>>measurement was taken.
>
> A turntable belt has a lot of stretch to it.

Depends on the individual TT. I've seen belts made of rubberized fabric
that didn't stretch at all. My old Rek-O-Kut TT had a belt that would not
stretcch at all made of some woven vulcanized rubber stuff. Any TT with a
heavy platter like the Rek-O is likely to have a stiff belt. Some of the
el-cheepo tables with aluminum platter will likely have a more stretchy
belt but it's not etched in stone.
From: David Nebenzahl on
On 6/3/2010 1:08 PM Jim Yanik spake thus:

> zekfrivo(a)zekfrivolous.com (GregS) wrote in
> news:hu91s4$j52$1(a)usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu:
>
>> In article <O9idnSsjYas_aprRnZ2dnUVZ_qCdnZ2d(a)mchsi.com>, "William R.
>> Walsh" <newsgroups1(a)idontwantjunqueemail.walshcomptech.com> wrote:
>>
>>>I recently dug up an old JC Penney MCS 2230 integrated stereo, and I'd
>>>like to get the turntable going again. (Despite the source, it's a
>>>pretty nice stereo system...the radio tuner works well, it seems to
>>>have about a 40Wx2 output power rating (which seems reasonable, having
>>>looked at the internals), the cassette deck is a partial logic design
>>>with the ability to skip ahead 1, 2 or 3 songs and the turntable
>>>itself is a linear tracking type.)
>>>
>>>Anyway, before I stored it, the turntable was in need of a new belt. I
>>>set the belt aside and now it seems to be gone. I could have sworn
>>>that I read about how to determine an unknown belt size in the FAQ,
>>>but I could not find it just now. As best I remember, a string was
>>>used and placed around all the components driven by the belt, after
>>>which a measurement was taken.
>>
>> A turntable belt has a lot of stretch to it.
>>
>> You could do a Google search and find the belt like I
>> did..............
>> http://www.vintage-electronics.cc/Pennys,_JC_(MCS).html
>
> OK,then after that,WHERE do you buy a new belt?
> the store where I used to buy them locally has gone away. :-(

Well, I'm lucky to live near Berkeley (yeah, *that* Berkeley), which
still has an old-time electronics store (Al Lasher's Electronics). Been
there since the 1940s, and they have all kinds of belts for turntables,
cassettes and VCRs.

I can't remember the name of the line of belts, but I could ask next
time I go there.


--
The fashion in killing has an insouciant, flirty style this spring,
with the flaunting of well-defined muscle, wrapped in flags.

- Comment from an article on Antiwar.com (http://antiwar.com)
From: David Nebenzahl on
On 6/3/2010 11:42 AM William R. Walsh spake thus:

> Hello all...
>
> I recently dug up an old JC Penney MCS 2230 integrated stereo, and I'd like
> to get the turntable going again. (Despite the source, it's a pretty nice
> stereo system...the radio tuner works well, it seems to have about a 40Wx2
> output power rating (which seems reasonable, having looked at the
> internals), the cassette deck is a partial logic design with the ability to
> skip ahead 1, 2 or 3 songs and the turntable itself is a linear tracking
> type.)
>
> Anyway, before I stored it, the turntable was in need of a new belt. I set
> the belt aside and now it seems to be gone. I could have sworn that I read
> about how to determine an unknown belt size in the FAQ, but I could not find
> it just now. As best I remember, a string was used and placed around all the
> components driven by the belt, after which a measurement was taken.

Instead of string, which does stretch, you might try a strip of paper.

Which reminds me of an old turntable I used to have. As a kid in Tucson,
not quite 20, I found a used turntable in a junk shop there. Cheap,
because it had no belt. Took it home, and being the resourceful lad I
was, I made a belt out of paper, the ends glued together with white
glue. Worked great! No problems with wow & flutter or rumble. The paper
belts lasted maybe a month or so before breaking. The bulb-shaped motor
pulley kept the belt tracking true.

Can't remember the brand, but it was an interesting turntable. Very
simple: just a deck, a motor, a spindle with inner and outer platters,
and an arm mounted on some kind of isolator. The arm had a single pivot.
Worked really well. (My poor man's AR.)


--
The fashion in killing has an insouciant, flirty style this spring,
with the flaunting of well-defined muscle, wrapped in flags.

- Comment from an article on Antiwar.com (http://antiwar.com)
From: GregS on
In article <pan.2010.06.03.20.25.51(a)gmail.com>, Meat Plow <mhywatt(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:05:21 +0000, GregS ǝʇoɹʍ:
>
>> n article <O9idnSsjYas_aprRnZ2dnUVZ_qCdnZ2d(a)mchsi.com>, "William R.
>> Walsh" <newsgroups1(a)idontwantjunqueemail.walshcomptech.com> wrote:
>>>Hello all...
>>>
>>>I recently dug up an old JC Penney MCS 2230 integrated stereo, and I'd
>>>like to get the turntable going again. (Despite the source, it's a
>>>pretty nice stereo system...the radio tuner works well, it seems to have
>>>about a 40Wx2 output power rating (which seems reasonable, having looked
>>>at the internals), the cassette deck is a partial logic design with the
>>>ability to skip ahead 1, 2 or 3 songs and the turntable itself is a
>>>linear tracking type.)
>>>
>>>Anyway, before I stored it, the turntable was in need of a new belt. I
>>>set the belt aside and now it seems to be gone. I could have sworn that
>>>I read about how to determine an unknown belt size in the FAQ, but I
>>>could not find it just now. As best I remember, a string was used and
>>>placed around all the components driven by the belt, after which a
>>>measurement was taken.
>>
>> A turntable belt has a lot of stretch to it.
>
>Depends on the individual TT. I've seen belts made of rubberized fabric
>that didn't stretch at all. My old Rek-O-Kut TT had a belt that would not
>stretcch at all made of some woven vulcanized rubber stuff. Any TT with a
>heavy platter like the Rek-O is likely to have a stiff belt. Some of the
>el-cheepo tables with aluminum platter will likely have a more stretchy
>belt but it's not etched in stone.

The whole idea is isolation. All mine had loose belts. My
best Thorens TD-125 was stretchy. Had a SME arm to install on it, but
sold them both.

greg
From: Meat Plow on
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:07:28 +0000, GregS ǝʇoɹʍ:

> In article <pan.2010.06.03.20.25.51(a)gmail.com>, Meat Plow
> <mhywatt(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:05:21 +0000, GregS ǝʇoɹʍ:
>>
>>> n article <O9idnSsjYas_aprRnZ2dnUVZ_qCdnZ2d(a)mchsi.com>, "William R.
>>> Walsh" <newsgroups1(a)idontwantjunqueemail.walshcomptech.com> wrote:
>>>>Hello all...
>>>>
>>>>I recently dug up an old JC Penney MCS 2230 integrated stereo, and I'd
>>>>like to get the turntable going again. (Despite the source, it's a
>>>>pretty nice stereo system...the radio tuner works well, it seems to
>>>>have about a 40Wx2 output power rating (which seems reasonable, having
>>>>looked at the internals), the cassette deck is a partial logic design
>>>>with the ability to skip ahead 1, 2 or 3 songs and the turntable
>>>>itself is a linear tracking type.)
>>>>
>>>>Anyway, before I stored it, the turntable was in need of a new belt. I
>>>>set the belt aside and now it seems to be gone. I could have sworn
>>>>that I read about how to determine an unknown belt size in the FAQ,
>>>>but I could not find it just now. As best I remember, a string was
>>>>used and placed around all the components driven by the belt, after
>>>>which a measurement was taken.
>>>
>>> A turntable belt has a lot of stretch to it.
>>
>>Depends on the individual TT. I've seen belts made of rubberized fabric
>>that didn't stretch at all. My old Rek-O-Kut TT had a belt that would
>>not stretcch at all made of some woven vulcanized rubber stuff. Any TT
>>with a heavy platter like the Rek-O is likely to have a stiff belt. Some
>>of the el-cheepo tables with aluminum platter will likely have a more
>>stretchy belt but it's not etched in stone.
>
> The whole idea is isolation. All mine had loose belts. My best Thorens
> TD-125 was stretchy. Had a SME arm to install on it, but sold them both.
>
> greg

Loose and stretchy are different things. The belt on the Rek-O was loose
too and I agree that isolation from the drive is a good idea. A stretchy
belt, with more stretch than what is designed, is not good for speed
stability or drift.