Prev: help wanted on a trig equation #353; Correcting Math
Next: Proof of the theorem that a precise definition of finite involves a selection #354; Correcting Math
From: Marc Alcobé García on 27 Jan 2010 03:40 Hi, Again, in Levi's Basic Set Theory it is read: "The system of axioms obtained from ZF by adding to it the axiom of choice will be denoted ZFC. The reason for this segregation of the axiom of choice is not because the axiom is a dubious one. It is because ZF is sufficient for many set theoretical purposes. Also, investigations concerning statements of set theory which are contradicted by the axiom of choice turned out to be very interesting and to have considerable applications to the set theory ZFC and its extensions." Could anyone provide some examples of the usefulness of these investigations, specially those with applications to ZFC and its extensions?
From: Aatu Koskensilta on 27 Jan 2010 03:45 Marc Alcob� Garc�a <malcobe(a)gmail.com> writes: > Could anyone provide some examples of the usefulness of these > investigations, specially those with applications to ZFC and its > extensions? The obvious example is the axiom of determinacy, which holds "in the clarity of an inner model" given suitable large large cardinals, and its use in descriptive set theory. -- Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta(a)uta.fi) "Wovon man nicht sprechan kann, dar�ber muss man schweigen" - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
From: Marc Alcobé García on 27 Jan 2010 09:21 On 27 ene, 09:45, Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensi...(a)uta.fi> wrote: > Marc Alcobé García <malc...(a)gmail.com> writes: > > > Could anyone provide some examples of the usefulness of these > > investigations, specially those with applications to ZFC and its > > extensions? > > The obvious example is the axiom of determinacy, which holds "in the > clarity of an inner model" given suitable large large cardinals, and its > use in descriptive set theory. > > -- > Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensi...(a)uta.fi) > > "Wovon man nicht sprechan kann, darüber muss man schweigen" > - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus Could you extend a bit more on this? I mean, what does the axiom of determinacy reveal about the structure of sets as described by ZFC and its extensions?
From: Newberry on 27 Jan 2010 21:30 On Jan 27, 12:40 am, Marc Alcobé García <malc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Again, in Levi's Basic Set Theory it is read: > > "The system of axioms obtained from ZF by adding to it the axiom of > choice will be denoted ZFC. The reason for this segregation of the > axiom of choice is not because the axiom is a dubious one. It is > because ZF is sufficient for many set theoretical purposes. Also, > investigations concerning statements of set theory which are > contradicted by the axiom of choice turned out to be very interesting > and to have considerable applications to the set theory ZFC and its > extensions." > > Could anyone provide some examples of the usefulness of these > investigations, specially those with applications to ZFC and its > extensions? Neither the axiom of choice nor the statements that contradict it have any usefuness. The pragmatic test eliminates the transfinite mathematics.
From: Newberry on 27 Jan 2010 21:31
On Jan 27, 12:45 am, Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensi...(a)uta.fi> wrote: > Marc Alcob Garc a <malc...(a)gmail.com> writes: > > > Could anyone provide some examples of the usefulness of these > > investigations, specially those with applications to ZFC and its > > extensions? > > The obvious example is the axiom of determinacy, which holds "in the > clarity of an inner model" given suitable large large cardinals, and its > use in descriptive set theory. Could you expand on the "usefulness" of this axiom? |