Prev: ChooseFont() CF_EFFECTS
Next: Looking for Open XML SDK tutorial in C++
From: Jonathan de Boyne Pollard on 6 Apr 2010 19:50
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<blockquote cite="mid:elmr87-77i.ln1(a)satorlaser.homedns.org" type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<p>Please learn about Usenet, and about the <em>actual</em>
distinction, between text and <em>binaries</em>, that it has.&nbsp; Then
learn what the 'T' in "HTML" stands for.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Usenet is the thing with the humans, as opposed to the one with
the tubes, right? ;)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Humans are capable of looking at hypertext and recognizing it as
text.&nbsp; And there are large parts of Usenet dedicated to posts that
aren't directly read by humans.&nbsp; So you might want to think harder
about that question than you have.&nbsp; As I said: The actual distinction
on Usenet is between text and binaries.<br>
</p>
<blockquote cite="mid:elmr87-77i.ln1(a)satorlaser.homedns.org" type="cite">
<p>Sorry, but I really don't understand [...]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That's because you don't know enough about Usenet.&nbsp; This is Usenet.&nbsp;
It has a "What is Usenet?" FAQ, and you need to start with the answer
to item #12 therein.&nbsp; It's especially apposite given that you mentioned
EBCDIC.&nbsp; The distinction on Usenet is between <em>text</em> and <em>binaries</em>,
with hyper<em>text</em> falling on the text side of that divide.&nbsp;
Binaries are bodypart types such as <code>audio/*</code>, <code>video/*</code>,
and <code>image/*</code>.&nbsp; <code>text/*</code> bodypart types are
text, obviously enough.&nbsp; One of the long-since-learned lessons of
Usenet (and many other discussion networks), moreover, is that markup
and metadata are necessary, with anything less being unreliable at
best.&nbsp; This is, of course, one of the reasons that they were invented
in the first place.&nbsp; <br>
</p>
<blockquote cite="mid:elmr87-77i.ln1(a)satorlaser.homedns.org" type="cite">
<p>Deliberately violating best practices isn't helpful, it will only
get you ignored or flamed.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So why then did you deliberately violate the best practice of moving
a thread to the newsgroups where it is on-topic and out of the
newsgroups where it isn't?&nbsp; Did you want to be ignored or flamed for
being unhelpful to the people who subscribed to the newsgroups for
discussions of reading Usenet expecting that such discussions would be
found there?</p>
</body>
</html>
From: Ulrich Eckhardt on 7 Apr 2010 03:50
Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote:
> <blockquote cite="mid:elmr87-77i.ln1(a)satorlaser.homedns.org" type="cite">
>   <blockquote type="cite">
>     <p>Please learn about Usenet, and about the <em>actual</em>
> distinction, between text and <em>binaries</em>, that it has.&nbsp; Then
> learn what the 'T' in "HTML" stands for.</p>
>   </blockquote>
>   <p>Usenet is the thing with the humans, as opposed to the one with
> the tubes, right? ;)</p>
> </blockquote>
> <p>Humans are capable of looking at hypertext and recognizing it as
> text.&nbsp;

Naja, dann kannst Du ja auch "google translator" benutzen um zu verstehen
was ich hier schreibe, oder? Klar kannst Du, aber es ist eine Zumutung.

> And there are large parts of Usenet dedicated to posts that aren't
> directly read by humans.&nbsp; So you might want to think harder about
> that question than you have.&nbsp; As I said: The actual distinction
> on Usenet is between text and binaries.<br>

....oder zwischen Leuten die verstehen was ein Smiley ist und denen die es
nicht tun?

> </p>
> <blockquote cite="mid:elmr87-77i.ln1(a)satorlaser.homedns.org" type="cite">
>   <p>Sorry, but I really don't understand [...]</p>
> </blockquote>
> <p>That's because you don't know enough about Usenet.&nbsp;

Ich poste seit >10 Jahren hier, ich glaube ich kenne mich recht gut aus mit
der Kultur hier.

> The distinction on Usenet is between <em>text</em> and <em>binaries</em>,
> with hyper<em>text</em> falling on the text side of that divide.&nbsp;

Sieh mal, genau das ist das wo meine Meinung eine andere ist. HT ist einfach
nicht nur Text, genauso koennte ich Dir irgendetwas base64-kodiertes
vorwerfen, das ist ja auch nur Text.

> One of the long-since-learned lessons of Usenet (and many other discussion
> networks), moreover, is that markup and metadata are necessary, with
> anything less being unreliable at best.&nbsp; This is, of course, one of
> the reasons that they were invented in the first place.&nbsp; <br> </p>

Du kannst Text sehr wohl formatieren ohne auf HTML zurueckzugreifen. Es gibt
da ein paar Gepflogenheiten z.B. fuer /kursiv/ oder *fett* gedruckte
Woerter, wie z.B. von vielen Wikis verwendet.

> <blockquote cite="mid:elmr87-77i.ln1(a)satorlaser.homedns.org" type="cite">
>   <p>Deliberately violating best practices isn't helpful, it will only
> get you ignored or flamed.</p>
> </blockquote>
> <p>So why then did you deliberately violate the best practice of moving
> a thread to the newsgroups where it is on-topic and out of the
> newsgroups where it isn't?&nbsp; Did you want to be ignored or flamed for
> being unhelpful to the people who subscribed to the newsgroups for
> discussions of reading Usenet expecting that such discussions would be
> found there?</p>

It's meta-topic and thus indeed belongs here. In any case, I have conducted
a websearch on you and found that it is completely useless arguing with
you, as others have found out the hard way before. You're boring and a
nuisance, i.e. best ignored.

Uli

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: ChooseFont() CF_EFFECTS
Next: Looking for Open XML SDK tutorial in C++