Using Magic Mail on Win 7
in [Windows Viruses]
|
Prev: Lsas Blaster Keyloger
Next: Deleting Doubleclick.net
From: MEB on 27 Jan 2010 21:08 On 01/27/2010 09:00 PM, MEB wrote: > On 01/27/2010 08:34 PM, David H. Lipman wrote: >> From: "MEB" <MEB-not-here(a)hotmail.com> >> >> < snip > >> >> "A funny thing happened on the way to the forum" >> >> Zero Mostel >> > > Yeah, liked that movie... glad you knew it was meant as personal... > gees, now there's a a grammatical mistake for ya,,, "was" verses "wasn't",,, now if they could only attach the computer to the brain or create a program that knew what we *actually* meant to type... -- MEB
From: Hot-text on 28 Jan 2010 01:17 http://www.magic-email.com/sitemap << I see magic-email have no HELP FOR YOU So you need to be Anonymity http://sourceforge.net/projects/mmm3/support <<< no update magic-email for Windows 7 http://sourceforge.net/users/grigsoft << He made it he can Help you! "W. eWatson" <wolftracks(a)invalid.com> wrote in message news:hjn85n$gu7$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > I downloaded and unzipped Magic Mail on my Win7 machine, but the Magic.exe > program wants to unzip again. Is Win7 having trouble understanding it's an > executable, and now some sort of zipped file? How does it get fixed?
From: "FromTheRafters" erratic on 30 Jan 2010 18:12 "MEB" <MEB-not-here(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:%23w9K37FoKHA.1544(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > > Care if I join? Ask the moderator if it is okay. :o/ [...] > So now here are the questions to ponder: > > What part or parts of this discussion is/are off topic? IMO only the initial post was on topic. It might have been related to the security feature that gives you 'integrity levels' - files from the internet have low mandatory labels.
From: MEB on 30 Jan 2010 19:15 On 01/30/2010 06:12 PM, FromTheRafters wrote: > "MEB" <MEB-not-here(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:%23w9K37FoKHA.1544(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> >> Care if I join? > > Ask the moderator if it is okay. :o/ > > [...] > >> So now here are the questions to ponder: >> >> What part or parts of this discussion is/are off topic? > > IMO only the initial post was on topic. It might have been related to > the security feature that gives you 'integrity levels' - files from the > internet have low mandatory labels. > > I would go with at least the post, response, the attempted explanation for the post, and maybe a bit more since it was in explanation [maybe six posts, since the issue was broached here]. Then again, here we are in the same heading, discussing relevance when where we "sit" *it may all be*; whereas others may find it entirely off topic for ".security.virus" issues [key being virus]. Save for perhaps direction to the standards that apply in this forum and general posting advisements. So would it be safe to say: "Its all relative ..."? Should we "get a room"? IMO it would have been better to put this secondary under its own heading since some issues WERE/ARE relevant to the group as a "group", not necessarily as virus related.. But who am I to determine that... -- MEB
From: W. eWatson on 30 Jan 2010 23:29
I think we have a winner. Forget m3. <www.poppeeper.com> |