Prev: contrib check fail at pgcrypto on Windows Server 2008 64bit 9.0dev (HEAD near alpha5)
Next: [HACKERS] Autonomous transaction
From: Tom Lane on 5 Apr 2010 10:15
Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro(a)oss.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> Do we still need VACUUM FULL in initdb? VACUUM FULL in 9.0 rewrites
> all tables, so those operations are a little more expensive than
> previous releases. Is it worth replacing them into VACUUM?

I had left it that way intentionally to make sure there was nothing
depending on catalogs retaining their original relfilenode number.
I'm not sure that speed of initdb is a particularly significant factor.

regards, tom lane

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: contrib check fail at pgcrypto on Windows Server 2008 64bit 9.0dev (HEAD near alpha5)
Next: [HACKERS] Autonomous transaction