From: Barry Flynn on
Hi

In VB 2008 there seems to be three places where you can specify x86 or
AnyCPU.
1. From the main IDE window, there is a platform drop down box next to the
Debug/Release drop down box
2. From the Build Configuration Manager, there is an "active solution
platform" at the top of the form
3. On the same form, there is a "platform" option in the grid for each
project in the solution.

Which one(s) of those matter? Which one(s) actually specify that you are
building a project for the 32 bit platform?

A semi related question.
For a couple of those choices, x86 does not appear as an option until you go
to the Configuration Manager, and select "new" from the "active solution
platform".
You can then choose x86 as the "new" platform.
However, that form has a "copy settings from" field, with choices of
"anycpu" (the default) or "empty".
What effect does that field have on the "new x86" platform?
I'm nervous about creating a new "x86 option" which in fact is a clone of
the "anycpu" option.

Thanks

Barry


From: Barry Flynn on
Sorry - picked the wrong group by mistake.

Barry


"Barry Flynn" <Anonymouse> wrote in message
news:uF6UJk0ELHA.5700(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Hi
>
> In VB 2008 there seems to be three places where you can specify x86 or
> AnyCPU.
> 1. From the main IDE window, there is a platform drop down box next to the
> Debug/Release drop down box
> 2. From the Build Configuration Manager, there is an "active solution
> platform" at the top of the form
> 3. On the same form, there is a "platform" option in the grid for each
> project in the solution.
>
> Which one(s) of those matter? Which one(s) actually specify that you are
> building a project for the 32 bit platform?
>
> A semi related question.
> For a couple of those choices, x86 does not appear as an option until you
> go to the Configuration Manager, and select "new" from the "active
> solution platform".
> You can then choose x86 as the "new" platform.
> However, that form has a "copy settings from" field, with choices of
> "anycpu" (the default) or "empty".
> What effect does that field have on the "new x86" platform?
> I'm nervous about creating a new "x86 option" which in fact is a clone of
> the "anycpu" option.
>
> Thanks
>
> Barry
>
>


From: Mike Williams on
"Barry Flynn" <Anonymouse> wrote in message
news:O6ED%23l0ELHA.5736(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> Sorry - picked the wrong group by mistake.

Actually this is the right group . . . you just happened to pick the wrong
product ;-)

Mike



From: Paul Clement on
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 14:57:50 +1200, "Barry Flynn" <Anonymouse> wrote:

� Hi

� In VB 2008 there seems to be three places where you can specify x86 or
� AnyCPU.
� 1. From the main IDE window, there is a platform drop down box next to the
� Debug/Release drop down box
� 2. From the Build Configuration Manager, there is an "active solution
� platform" at the top of the form
� 3. On the same form, there is a "platform" option in the grid for each
� project in the solution.

� Which one(s) of those matter? Which one(s) actually specify that you are
� building a project for the 32 bit platform?

� A semi related question.
� For a couple of those choices, x86 does not appear as an option until you go
� to the Configuration Manager, and select "new" from the "active solution
� platform".
� You can then choose x86 as the "new" platform.
� However, that form has a "copy settings from" field, with choices of
� "anycpu" (the default) or "empty".
� What effect does that field have on the "new x86" platform?
� I'm nervous about creating a new "x86 option" which in fact is a clone of
� the "anycpu" option.

Use Configuration Manager. See the below link for Visual Basic .NET questions:

http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/vbgeneral/threads


Paul
~~~~
Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)
From: Kevin Provance on

"Paul Clement" <UseAdddressAtEndofMessage(a)swspectrum.com> wrote in message
news:sf072695t5d624hde85stq4coavsjdsdrl(a)4ax.com...
: On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 14:57:50 +1200, "Barry Flynn" <Anonymouse> wrote:
:
: Hi
:
: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/vbgeneral/threads
:

You're off topic again, paulie dingleball. Be a good parrot and stop
trolling the classic vb community with your unwanted .nxt evangelism. or do
you need a reminder every time you ignore the status quo? After all, you
don't get dingleballs for being a troll here. <eg>


--
Customer Hatred Knows No Bounds at MSFT
Free usenet access at http://www.eternal-september.org
ClassicVB Users Regroup! comp.lang.basic.visual.misc

Bawwk! Paulie want a dingleball, bawwk!

 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: 2 questions
Next: ADO FetchProgress doesn't fire