From: David Webber on 23 May 2010 07:52 Just spent a happy Sunday morning installing VS 2010. Plus point: it found one syntax error in my several thousand .cpp files which VS 2008 missed. Problems: one or two minor ones not yet resolved. Is there any reason why a resource only DLL compiled with VS2008 should not work properly with a program compiled with VS2010 ? What about other non-MFC DLLs with a pure C interface? Dave -- David Webber Mozart Music Software http://www.mozart.co.uk For discussion and support see http://www.mozart.co.uk/mozartists/mailinglist.htm
From: David Lowndes on 23 May 2010 09:43 >Is there any reason why a resource only DLL compiled with VS2008 should not >work properly with a program compiled with VS2010 ? None that I can imagine. >What about other non-MFC DLLs with a pure C interface? Again, it ought to work. Dave Lowndes
From: David Webber on 23 May 2010 10:22 "David Lowndes" <DavidL(a)example.invalid> wrote in message news:u6civ5l08acn07cf9ca55crpmbnkdc1mn5(a)4ax.com... >>Is there any reason why a resource only DLL compiled with VS2008 should >>not >>work properly with a program compiled with VS2010 ? > > None that I can imagine. > >>What about other non-MFC DLLs with a pure C interface? > > Again, it ought to work. Thought so. Thanks for the confirmation. I was getting asserts when passing a NULL hInstance to AfxSetResourceHandle() in the 2010 compilation. I thought perhaps it wasn't loading the resource DLL's (and thus getting a NULL hInstance). After I posted the question I recompiled all my DLLs with VS2010 and still had the problem. So I replaced AfxSetResourceHandle( hInstance ); everywhere with if( hInstance ) AfxSetResourceHandle( hInstance ); and it seems to work - all tests have been passed thus far. So maybe, while AfxSetResourceHandle( NULL ) asserts in 2010, it was fail-safe in 2008, and I just hadn't noticed that hInstance could be NULL in some circumstances. It might be something to look out for, for anyone upgrading the compiler. Dave -- David Webber Mozart Music Software http://www.mozart.co.uk For discussion and support see http://www.mozart.co.uk/mozartists/mailinglist.htm
From: Joseph M. Newcomer on 23 May 2010 12:06 See below... On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:52:42 +0100, "David Webber" <dave(a)musical-dot-demon-dot-co.uk> wrote: > >Just spent a happy Sunday morning installing VS 2010. > >Plus point: it found one syntax error in my several thousand .cpp files >which VS 2008 missed. > >Problems: one or two minor ones not yet resolved. > >Is there any reason why a resource only DLL compiled with VS2008 should not >work properly with a program compiled with VS2010 ? **** Since there is no code, there should be no difference between the two. **** > >What about other non-MFC DLLs with a pure C interface? *** Depends. Do they use the C Runtime (CRT)? If so, do they statically link it or used the shared C runtime DLL? If they use the shared C runtime DLL, you might have problems. If they statically link, you have the problems of having multiple heaps being managed by multiple runtimes. This hazard has not change because of VS2010. joe **** > >Dave Joseph M. Newcomer [MVP] email: newcomer(a)flounder.com Web: http://www.flounder.com MVP Tips: http://www.flounder.com/mvp_tips.htm
From: Mihai N. on 23 May 2010 14:58 > Is there any reason why a resource only DLL compiled with VS2008 should not > work properly with a program compiled with VS2010 ? No idea why. Except maybe something crazy with manifests? It might also depend if it is really resource only, or if there is an entry point. (if you don't use LoadLibraryEx with LOAD_LIBRARY_AS_DATAFILE, LOAD_LIBRARY_AS_DATAFILE_EXCLUSIVE, LOAD_LIBRARY_AS_IMAGE_RESOURCE, or DONT_RESOLVE_DLL_REFERENCES, then you would need a DllMain) Maybe a dumpbin /all and a diff would help. -- Mihai Nita [Microsoft MVP, Visual C++] http://www.mihai-nita.net ------------------------------------------ Replace _year_ with _ to get the real email
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Prev: sdi: recevie on_message without a cwnd class Next: calling IEIsProtectedModeProcess |