From: Jeff on 20 Jan 2007 20:18 Is there a risk of messing things up by using validate in Quicken? Jeff
From: Jim Jensen on 20 Jan 2007 21:16 "Jeff" <Willliam(a)naol.com> wrote in message news:ufzsh.1288$jb3.307(a)newsfe18.lga > Is there a risk of messing things up by using validate in Quicken? > > Jeff Just back up first. You can do anything you want if you just back up first.
From: Jeff on 21 Jan 2007 15:29 "Jim Jensen" <me(a)privacy.net> wrote in message news:02Ash.36396$Gr2.27122(a)newssvr21.news.prodigy.net... "Jeff" <Willliam(a)naol.com> wrote in message news:ufzsh.1288$jb3.307(a)newsfe18.lga > Is there a risk of messing things up by using validate in Quicken? > > Jeff Just back up first. You can do anything you want if you just back up first. OK, I backed up and then ran validate. It did its thing and - although it does not seem to have changed any of the totals or balances, it created a log file which shows things where it "Fixed damage for account .....". Without exception all the lines (they are a great many) consist of variations on the following: Found backfill cash transaction: " 'acct name' 'equity name...' " 7/31/2006 "Balancing Cash Adjustment" Found ex information for backfill cash transaction. Found backfill pair with id: 31558 followed by: QEL: No read errors. QEL: All internal consistency checks passed. What do I do with this logged data? Is it something I am doing wrong that has caused all these errors? Jeff
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Quicken Server problems? Next: What does bindcontent.exe do?? |