From: PL on 14 Jul 2010 15:23 Hi, I'm looking for a way to remove a for loop. a is a matrix with know integer values from 1 to n. I need to do separate operations for each value of n. n is a big number and a is a big matrix, so it consumes a lot of time now. What I want is transforming this: for i=1:n a=(b==i); (operations on a) end into something similar like this: (compute a(i)) for i=1:n (operations on a(i)) end Is the a way to compute for i=1:n a=(b==i); end faster? Thanks
From: us on 14 Jul 2010 15:53 "PL " <pluc_2254(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message <i1l2qv$2f2$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>... > Hi, > I'm looking for a way to remove a for loop. a is a matrix with know integer values from 1 to n. I need to do separate operations for each value of n. n is a big number and a is a big matrix, so it consumes a lot of time now. > > What I want is transforming this: > > for i=1:n > a=(b==i); > (operations on a) > end > > into something similar like this: > > (compute a(i)) > for i=1:n > (operations on a(i)) > end > > Is the a way to compute > for i=1:n > a=(b==i); > end > > faster? > > Thanks there's stuff like help arrayfun; % <- and siblings... % however, while syntactically more pretty, they are rarely faster % also, there's the possibility of MEXing ML code... us
From: Alan B on 14 Jul 2010 16:19 "us " <us(a)neurol.unizh.ch> wrote in message <i1l4j0$r07$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>... > "PL " <pluc_2254(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message <i1l2qv$2f2$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>... > > Hi, > > I'm looking for a way to remove a for loop. a is a matrix with know integer values from 1 to n. I need to do separate operations for each value of n. n is a big number and a is a big matrix, so it consumes a lot of time now. > > > > What I want is transforming this: > > > > for i=1:n > > a=(b==i); > > (operations on a) > > end > > > > into something similar like this: > > > > (compute a(i)) > > for i=1:n > > (operations on a(i)) > > end > > > > Is the a way to compute > > for i=1:n > > a=(b==i); > > end > > > > faster? > > > > Thanks > > there's stuff like > > help arrayfun; % <- and siblings... > % however, while syntactically more pretty, they are rarely faster > % also, there's the possibility of MEXing ML code... > > us Am I missing something? Isn't this just: a = b==(1:n); OP doesn't seem to be asking about the rest of the "operations on a", just that first line inside the loop.
From: us on 14 Jul 2010 16:35 "Alan B" > Am I missing something? Isn't this just: > a = b==(1:n); > > OP doesn't seem to be asking about the rest of the "operations on a", just that first line inside the loop. well... let's assume it isn't THAT simple... :-) us
From: PL on 14 Jul 2010 16:36 "Alan B" <monguin61REM(a)OVETHIS.yahoo.com> wrote in message <i1l647$bhv$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>... > "us " <us(a)neurol.unizh.ch> wrote in message <i1l4j0$r07$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>... > > "PL " <pluc_2254(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message <i1l2qv$2f2$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>... > > > Hi, > > > I'm looking for a way to remove a for loop. a is a matrix with know integer values from 1 to n. I need to do separate operations for each value of n. n is a big number and a is a big matrix, so it consumes a lot of time now. > > > > > > What I want is transforming this: > > > > > > for i=1:n > > > a=(b==i); > > > (operations on a) > > > end > > > > > > into something similar like this: > > > > > > (compute a(i)) > > > for i=1:n > > > (operations on a(i)) > > > end > > > > > > Is the a way to compute > > > for i=1:n > > > a=(b==i); > > > end > > > > > > faster? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > there's stuff like > > > > help arrayfun; % <- and siblings... > > % however, while syntactically more pretty, they are rarely faster > > % also, there's the possibility of MEXing ML code... > > > > us > > Am I missing something? Isn't this just: > a = b==(1:n); > > OP doesn't seem to be asking about the rest of the "operations on a", just that first line inside the loop. Indeed, but your line is not working (at least, for my needs): a=floor(5*rand(5)+1); b = a==(1:5) ??? Error using ==> eq Matrix dimensions must agree.
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: rotating only object in a plot Next: Displaying IPA phonetic fonts on a plot |