From: tlbs101 on
On Apr 30, 10:55 am, John Larkin
<jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:52:59 -0700, "Joel Koltner"
>
> <zapwireDASHgro...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> >I bet Agilent wants a pretty penny for their new 32GHz real-time scopes:
> >http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5990-5271EN.pdf
>
> >And to think that it was only ~20 years ago that a Tek 11802 with the SD-24
> >(24GHz) sampling head -- that samples at all of 100kHz -- was the hotest
> >ticket...  now available on eBay for some single-digit percentage of the
> >original price...
>
> >---Joel
>
> I recently got this email from my friend Mark Kahrs, the
> sampling-scope-history expert:
>
> ==========================
>
> Yes, the former Soviets did have a 7 GHz real time scope, and a 20 GHz
> transient digitizer. They both used the same technique to get the
> super high speed – keep the deflection angle low.
>
> When I managed a design project in the transient digitizer group at
> Tek, I went on a customer visit and met with engineers working for
> EG&G at the Nevada Test Site. The time was after Glasnost, near the
> end of the era of underground testing. A delegation of Soviet
> scientists were actually invited over to witness a test shot (They did
> the same, hosting a group of scientists from Livermore National Labs).
> EG&G was using the new 3 GHz transient digitizer from Tek, and thought
> its "leading edge" technology would impress their former foes. The
> Soviets were not impressed, stating that they had a 20 GHz digitizer.
> How did they do it? They way they surpassed many obstacles – by not
> placing needless restrictions on the technology. A design requirement
> for the US made digitizers was that they must fit in a standard 19"
> rack. The Soviets took a pragmatic approach, and avoded any size
> restrictions. The CRT in their digitizer was just short of 10 m in
> length! They used traveling wave distributed deflections plates as our
> designs did, but the beam deflection angle was incredibly small,
> allowing very high BW. Likewise, the 7 GHz real time scope had a CRT
> over 3 meters long.
>
> The funny part of this true story is that the EG&G team, confident
> that they had just showed what they thought was superior technology,
> asked if the Soviet scientists had any questions about it. They did.
> They asked "How do you get the walls so smooth in the tunnels?" The
> shot monitoring tunnels at NTS were drilled with diamond tipped tunnel
> boring machines, leaving a relatively smooth wall. The Soviets simply
> blasted their tunnels with dynamite.
>
> =================
>
> John

I remember that.

You probably passed me, in the tunnels.

The Soviet admission may be what prompted the EG&G Woburn group to
hire the electron LINAC guy so they could make an even faster 'scope.

Tom Pounds
From: John Larkin on
On Fri, 7 May 2010 14:25:29 -0700 (PDT), tlbs101 <tlbs101(a)excite.com>
wrote:

>On Apr 30, 10:55�am, John Larkin
><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:52:59 -0700, "Joel Koltner"
>>
>> <zapwireDASHgro...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >I bet Agilent wants a pretty penny for their new 32GHz real-time scopes:
>> >http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5990-5271EN.pdf
>>
>> >And to think that it was only ~20 years ago that a Tek 11802 with the SD-24
>> >(24GHz) sampling head -- that samples at all of 100kHz -- was the hotest
>> >ticket... �now available on eBay for some single-digit percentage of the
>> >original price...
>>
>> >---Joel
>>
>> I recently got this email from my friend Mark Kahrs, the
>> sampling-scope-history expert:
>>
>> ==========================
>>
>> Yes, the former Soviets did have a 7 GHz real time scope, and a 20 GHz
>> transient digitizer. They both used the same technique to get the
>> super high speed � keep the deflection angle low.
>>
>> When I managed a design project in the transient digitizer group at
>> Tek, I went on a customer visit and met with engineers working for
>> EG&G at the Nevada Test Site. The time was after Glasnost, near the
>> end of the era of underground testing. A delegation of Soviet
>> scientists were actually invited over to witness a test shot (They did
>> the same, hosting a group of scientists from Livermore National Labs).
>> EG&G was using the new 3 GHz transient digitizer from Tek, and thought
>> its "leading edge" technology would impress their former foes. The
>> Soviets were not impressed, stating that they had a 20 GHz digitizer.
>> How did they do it? They way they surpassed many obstacles � by not
>> placing needless restrictions on the technology. A design requirement
>> for the US made digitizers was that they must fit in a standard 19"
>> rack. The Soviets took a pragmatic approach, and avoded any size
>> restrictions. The CRT in their digitizer was just short of 10 m in
>> length! They used traveling wave distributed deflections plates as our
>> designs did, but the beam deflection angle was incredibly small,
>> allowing very high BW. Likewise, the 7 GHz real time scope had a CRT
>> over 3 meters long.
>>
>> The funny part of this true story is that the EG&G team, confident
>> that they had just showed what they thought was superior technology,
>> asked if the Soviet scientists had any questions about it. They did.
>> They asked "How do you get the walls so smooth in the tunnels?" The
>> shot monitoring tunnels at NTS were drilled with diamond tipped tunnel
>> boring machines, leaving a relatively smooth wall. The Soviets simply
>> blasted their tunnels with dynamite.
>>
>> =================
>>
>> John
>
>I remember that.
>
>You probably passed me, in the tunnels.
>
>The Soviet admission may be what prompted the EG&G Woburn group to
>hire the electron LINAC guy so they could make an even faster 'scope.
>
>Tom Pounds

This is a scan-conversion scope

http://www.greenfieldtechnology.com/-Data-aquisition-system-.html

that my friend Bernard still makes. He sort of copied my
company/products/logo, except that he has three seagulls and I have a
moon.

Tek used to sell this scope under their name, too. I think it was
developed by In-Snec for the French atom bomb program.

Modern digital scopes are up to 32 GHz single-shot. People are doing
stuff like digitizing x-band radar pulses right at the antanna.


John