Video: Ryan Dahl: Node.js
in [JavaScript]
|
Prev: FAQ Topic - Internationalisation and Multinationalisation in javascript. (2010-03-23)
Next: FAQ Topic - Internationalisation and Multinationalisation injavascript. (2010-03-23)
From: Ry Nohryb on 26 May 2010 13:19 On May 26, 7:06 pm, Scott Sauyet <scott.sau...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks. Much better. :-) And the rest of this thread has helped > explain a little about what node.js actually is. Certainly not TNO's posts. I think he's very very much disoriented wrt Node. Node is a tiny, lovely, and damn fast thing that you program in our much beloved JS. I'm using it now in every project. In some cases it's running 40 times faster than the Ruby tool it replaces... DAMN FAST :-) -- Jorge.
From: Lasse Reichstein Nielsen on 26 May 2010 13:28 Ry Nohryb <jorge(a)jorgechamorro.com> writes: > Yes, you ought to. Node.js has nothing to do with YUI. Node.js is a > wonderful thing for any JS programmer, even more so if he happens to > love unix. Yes, I think I like it, but I've had far too little time to actually do something with it. :) /L -- Lasse Reichstein Holst Nielsen 'Javascript frameworks is a disruptive technology'
From: "Michael Haufe ("TNO")" on 26 May 2010 14:03 On May 26, 12:19 pm, Ry Nohryb <jo...(a)jorgechamorro.com> wrote: > Certainly not TNO's posts. I think he's very very much disoriented wrt > Node. Node is a tiny, lovely, and damn fast thing that you program in > our much beloved JS. I'm using it now in every project. In some cases > it's running 40 times faster than the Ruby tool it replaces... DAMN > FAST :-) So sorry for not falling into fanboyism based on a few buzzwords. Calling something faster than Ruby isn't much of an accomplishment by itself as its well known as a relatively slow language to start with. In regards to "tiny", I guess you and I weren't watching the same video with the memory statistics involved. I stand by my claim that node.js is immature and premature. Experiment all you want, but I'd be wary of building anything business critical on it at this point.
From: Ry Nohryb on 26 May 2010 14:35 On May 26, 8:03 pm, "Michael Haufe (\"TNO\")" <t...(a)thenewobjective.com> wrote: > On May 26, 12:19 pm, Ry Nohryb <jo...(a)jorgechamorro.com> wrote: > > > Certainly not TNO's posts. I think he's very very much disoriented wrt > > Node. Node is a tiny, lovely, and damn fast thing that you program in > > our much beloved JS. I'm using it now in every project. In some cases > > it's running 40 times faster than the Ruby tool it replaces... DAMN > > FAST :-) > > So sorry for not falling into fanboyism based on a few buzzwords. > Calling something faster than Ruby isn't much of an accomplishment by > itself as its well known as a relatively slow language to start with. > In regards to "tiny", I guess you and I weren't watching the same > video with the memory statistics involved. I stand by my claim that > node.js is immature and premature. Experiment all you want, but I'd be > wary of building anything business critical on it at this point. So sorry for not agreeing with you nor with any of your pre-judices. -- Jorge.
From: "Michael Haufe ("TNO")" on 26 May 2010 14:40
On May 26, 1:35 pm, Ry Nohryb <jo...(a)jorgechamorro.com> wrote: > So sorry for not agreeing with you nor with any of your pre-judices. Apology accepted. |