Prev: Incoming mail messages causes "FROM" folders to expand
Next: otlkUI.20080729083102.dll cannot be loaded when u open outlook 07
From: Wilfried on 19 Jan 2009 08:44 "David Dickinson" <eveningstar(a)die-spammer-die-mvps.org> wrote: > Actually, Outlook 95, 97, 98, 2000, and XP (I've never had 2003) all had a > facility for viewing the original message source. It was usually available > on the Options dialog after setting a registry value: > > [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\12.0\Outlook\Options\Mail] > "SaveAllMIMENotJustHeaders"=dword:00000001 > > For some reason, I thought that this functionality was removed in Outlook > 2007, but after I applied the patch (for what I believed was the second > time) I can now view the original message source. Hi! Yes, but as far as my experience goes the message source will be stored in the .pst file for ever. If the message contains attachments and the registry value is set to 1, also the encoded attachments are stored in the message source. This way your .pst file may grow very fast. Deleting the attachments from the message only deletes the decoded versions but not the attachment part in the message source which is (encoded as it is) even larger than the original or decoded attachment. You can get rid of the large source messages only by deleting the message completely. Please correct me if there is a way for removing the attachments from the message source once the message has been stored in the .pst file. Wilfried > "Diane Poremsky [MVP]" <outlookmvp(a)msn.com> wrote in message > news:e7d8iy%23dJHA.4004(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > > Outlook has never supported message source with the header. Early versions > > didn't include the header as it was primarily a corp client and much of > > the email was internal with Exchange as the mail server. > > > > Outlook 2003 supports a reg hack to show the source with the header - see > > http://www.outlook-tips.net/howto/view_source.htm - but it only works on > > new mail downloaded after you set the key. It doesn't work in 2007. -- Wilfried Hennings please reply in the newsgroup, the e-mail address is invalid |