Prev: THE HOLY GRAIL ~ CANTOR DISPROOF
Next: DiHydrogen Monoxide...
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 24 May 2010 14:31

The Doppler redshift in Hubble's law is a lousy indicator of distance
and this is amply seen
in the Fiberglass Experiment where white headlights of cars moving
towards the observer,
not away from the observer, are redshifted. So this tells us that
Doppler redshift is lousy
on distance. This is because the redshift in astronomy is not due to
Doppler motion but
due to the geometry and other features of Space itself.

However, we should realize what use the Hubble redshift law has some
very important
use and a tool. It tells us if a cluster of galaxies are integrally
tied together by the EM
force. It tells us the extent and range of say the P-P supercluster or
the P-I supercluster.
So that if a large number of galaxies in a region of the sky all
possess the same Hubble
redshift, indicates they are connected as on supercluster. But it does
not tell us the
distance from Earth, and tells us only they are tied up together into
one superstructure.

Now I think I can get away with alot of calculations reduced to a
simple calculation. If
EM is the force that is at action in the Cosmic distribution of
galaxies, and because these
alternate bands of clusters then voids limits the viewing field of the
overall distribution,
that I can take a shortcut. All I need to do is somewhat measure the
angle of bending or
twisting of superclusters filaments of galaxies. The best examples are
the P-P and P-I
superclusters in the 3rd layer of Jarrett's mapping. Those two
superclusters reveal a
angle of bending or twisting in order to make a Ring. So they are a
slice of the overall
Ring of the 3rd layer and if I can thence measure the angle-of-bending
then I can fill in
the rest of the Ring that is not clearly seen. Now maybe the P-I
bending forms a
different and independent Ring from the P-P supercluster.

And looking at the 2nd layer in Jarrett's mapping:


http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff/jarrett/papers/LSS/

And looking at Virgo, Fornax and the Hydra-Cen superclusters of each
of their
angle-of-bending. My view of them is not accurate enough to pull a
number
for the angle of bending in each. Perhaps Jarrett and Juric have more
clear
and clarity of those superstructures to gain a angle-of-bending.

But I am going to assume two of them are of the same angle of bending,
meaning
they are parts of the same Ring in the 2nd layer. In fact, their angle
of bending
may also coincide with the P-P or P-I in the 3rd layer.

This Angle-of-Bending is going to be a very important parameter in
astronomy, for it
is like having different sizes of aluminum pie pans and given a slice
out of each of many
pie pans we can tell the overall Ring or total pie pan that a slice
came from. And we can
tell whether a supercluster is part of the same Ring as another
supercluster.

We can figure out if the Virgo, Fornax and Hydra-Cen all belong to the
same Ring or
whether one of them belongs with the P-P, P-I ring or some different
ring.

So the Angle of Bending of a supercluster is a very important
parameter in Astronomy
of the future, since most of the galaxies are not visible to the
telescope because they
are hidden from view due to the fact that EM distributes the galaxies
in alternating walls
and voids causing obstruction of view.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: THE HOLY GRAIL ~ CANTOR DISPROOF
Next: DiHydrogen Monoxide...