From: Bullwinkle on
They only drop Apple malware.


"~BD~" <.BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:htmsl4$kep$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...

"FromTheRafters" <erratic(a)nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:htljju$dev$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
| "~BD~" <.BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
| news:htl7dt$gdj$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
| >
| > "FromTheRafters" <erratic(a)nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
| > news:htkjgv$9m3$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
| >
| > | He's edited the registry and moved on...
| >
| >
| > Surely that's the *only* way to 'fix' things if malware has caused a
| > registry alteration?
|
| If the program was out of date and perhaps misidentifying a malware
| instance, what other settings might it have missed correcting? It
would
| be better to confirm or deny the use of the most recent version of the
| removal program. What if version 'b' edits the registry *and* drops
| another malware item and version 'a' gets identified and removed?
Sure,
| he can manually edit the registry entry he finds amiss back to what it
| should be, but it would be better to execute an updated version of
MBAM
| or another removal tool such as SAS.


What if MBAM itself was dropping a malware item after cleaning a
machine?

Who would ever know?

SAS might do likewise!

Just a thought!

--
Dave