From: Craig on
On 04/12/2010 06:37 AM, za kAT wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 06:21:35 -0700, Craig wrote:
>
>> On 04/12/2010 03:27 AM, Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>> vert wrote in news:qis5s51p1b6uqcvftt9tffu5d9no63d278(a)4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> Microsoft is losing to Apple, Google and RIM on mobile, in cloud
>>>> computing Azure is only just getting started, Internet Explorer is
>>>> down to a mere 61 per cent market share on browsers, and there's been
>>>> a slow but steady decline in web servers for Internet Information
>>>> Server (IIS) from around 20 per cent of the million busiest sites in
>>>> September 2008 to 17 per cent in March 2010
>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/12/visual_studio_2010_platform_cha
>>>> llenge/
>>>>
>>>> Hey BB, M$ is losing on all fronts.
>>>>
>>>
>>> All but the OS front. Google may soon remedy that. It certainly won't be
>>> Linux.
>>
>> Excellent point. But that would be Google *Linux* (i.e. ChromeOS, Android).
>
> It's not a fair fight.

<grin>

And to think that, before the US government granted BB access to the
internet, his willful ignorance couldn't be shared with the rest of the
world.

Hrmmm. Maybe government /is/ the problem!

--
-Craig
From: za kAT on
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 06:59:33 -0700, Craig wrote:

> On 04/12/2010 06:37 AM, za kAT wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 06:21:35 -0700, Craig wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/12/2010 03:27 AM, Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>>> vert wrote in news:qis5s51p1b6uqcvftt9tffu5d9no63d278(a)4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> Microsoft is losing to Apple, Google and RIM on mobile, in cloud
>>>>> computing Azure is only just getting started, Internet Explorer is
>>>>> down to a mere 61 per cent market share on browsers, and there's been
>>>>> a slow but steady decline in web servers for Internet Information
>>>>> Server (IIS) from around 20 per cent of the million busiest sites in
>>>>> September 2008 to 17 per cent in March 2010
>>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/12/visual_studio_2010_platform_cha
>>>>> llenge/
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey BB, M$ is losing on all fronts.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> All but the OS front. Google may soon remedy that. It certainly won't be
>>>> Linux.
>>>
>>> Excellent point. But that would be Google *Linux* (i.e. ChromeOS, Android).
>>
>> It's not a fair fight.
>
> <grin>
>
> And to think that, before the US government granted BB access to the
> internet, his willful ignorance couldn't be shared with the rest of the
> world.
>
> Hrmmm. Maybe government /is/ the problem!

<grin back>

I luv ur luv.
--
zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat - www.zakATsKopterChat.com
From: Craig on
On 04/12/2010 03:33 PM, Bear Bottoms wrote:
> Craig<netburgher(a)REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in
> news:hpv6ov$77s$1(a)news.eternal-september.org:
>
>> On 04/12/2010 03:27 AM, Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>> vert wrote in news:qis5s51p1b6uqcvftt9tffu5d9no63d278(a)4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> Microsoft is losing to Apple, Google and RIM on mobile, in cloud
>>>> computing Azure is only just getting started, Internet Explorer is
>>>> down to a mere 61 per cent market share on browsers, and there's
>>>> been a slow but steady decline in web servers for Internet
>>>> Information Server (IIS) from around 20 per cent of the million
>>>> busiest sites in September 2008 to 17 per cent in March 2010
>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/12/visual_studio_2010_platform_c
>>>> ha llenge/
>>>>
>>>> Hey BB, M$ is losing on all fronts.
>>>>
>>>
>>> All but the OS front. Google may soon remedy that. It certainly won't
>>> be Linux.
>>
>> Excellent point. But that would be Google *Linux* (i.e. ChromeOS,
>> Android).
>
> Well, it would be Google Chrome OS with a base of Linux run on a Windows
> OS from what I gather....

Well... yea, sure. OK. But don't forget the dollop of Solaris and the
shredded FreeBSD on top. Glad we straightened *that* out.

--
-Craig