From: Steve on 18 May 2010 17:05 In article <dpp5v55i8jtk8acft7tie10o09timslcol(a)4ax.com>, puddingDOTman(a)gmail.com says... > > On Tue, 18 May 2010 06:09:35 +0100, Benjamin Gawert <bgawert(a)gmx.de> wrote: > > >I'd say forget it. Why build a nice Core i5 system and then use it with > >an outdated OS that doesn't know about proper multi-core support, power > >management (especially CPU and SATA power saving modes), or most of the > >hardware? You can put lipstick on a pig, but it still remains a pig. It > >is time to let go and move to an operating system that is more > >appropriate for the hardware and is actually supported by its manufacturer. > > Why not flush 10 years of accumulated programs, data, etc etc? I'm not > gonna answer that question. :-) > > I thought I'd mentioned ... object was multi-boot ... old OS has > to install 1st. Must have mentioned it in a different thread. > > Anyway, the Win7-64 install CD has been sitting here, waiting for > me. > > P So run W2K on a virtual machine. s
From: Benjamin Gawert on 19 May 2010 04:42 Am 18.05.2010 20:21, * Puddin' Man: > Why not flush 10 years of accumulated programs, data, etc etc? I'm not > gonna answer that question. :-) What makes you think that upgrading to a new OS means you have to "flush" accumulated programs and data? Benjamin
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Diskette drive on new build Next: In the end, are CRT monitors bad for our health? |