From: Inverse 19 mathematics on
On Jun 30, 11:05 am, Inverse 19 mathematics <hope9...(a)verizon.net>
wrote:
>  The -1 tangent Prime sieve has been run against the  Atkins sieve,
> and there is no comparison, As one great Mathematical professor asked
> us , " How do you prove your numbers are prime numbers as we do in our
> Mathematics"
>
>  Thats a dumb questions Professor-- Ours is a series placement , if
> the seies runs like, 6,16, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48---  do you need to
> prove 48, for if even one number in the series is wrong , the restof
> the numbers will be wrong .  Our Prime program is a " CONTINUUM"
> understand Mathematics. This is the best  Prime number sieve and
> distribution , plus by reversing the computer program we can check the
> primality of any number, all you fermatist!
>
>  This will be memorialized in a Mathematics memorial monument in a
> month time -- and you all like it or not this is the greatest single
> discovery in the Prime number mathematics ever. We refuse to  send
> this to your Mathematics journals which are not qualified to review
> this new mathematics. You all can live in your illusions or accept an
> open challenge from us in the open all you Fermatists
>
> Linkhttp://hoperesearch.web.officelive.com/default.aspx
>
>  FERMAT TO GUMP-- What is Primality
>
>   FOREST GUMP----------- That  is the mathematicvs of the Apes,
> something like that.
>
>  Hope Research

***** IN the series above if the number 16 is in error , could you
get 48 , the rest will be in error , you Fermatists, what is correct
in the inverse will be correct in diverse, that is whhat mathematics
is , You fermatists your Atkins program is not a continuum, who cares
how fast it is.

Hope research