From: George Kerby on 25 Jun 2010 10:37 On 6/25/10 5:07 AM, in article 54ea7c22-d011-4c73-a84b-953f0427bd0e(a)w31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, "sobriquet" <dohduhdah(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On 25 jun, 09:10, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: >> sobriquet �<dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>> rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: >>>> Stealing isn't a human right, thief. >> >>> Sharing information is a human right, >> >> That's a lie, thief. > > nazi cockroach. <http://tinypic.com/r/fxqmh/6>
From: Ray Fischer on 26 Jun 2010 03:49 sobriquet <dohduhdah(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On 25 jun, 09:10, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: >> sobriquet �<dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> > rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: >> >> Stealing isn't a human right, thief. >> >> >Sharing information is a human right, >> >> That's a lie, thief. > >A fact, The screechings of a liar and thief are worthless. >> >Check article 19 of the UDHR that concerns the expression and >> >imparting of information: >> >> >http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml#a19 >> >> That refers to OPINIONS and EXPRESSION, thief. �Did you even read it? > >Here.. let me express some information for you: 010111010100000 And did anybody stop you, thief? >See.. now that's exactly the same as people who express information That doesn't even make sense, thief. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: sobriquet on 26 Jun 2010 12:20 On 26 jun, 09:49, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: [.. babbling ..] Ray Fischer the nazi cockroach just won't shut up and crawl back under his rock.
From: George Kerby on 26 Jun 2010 12:37 On 6/26/10 11:20 AM, in article 445569f0-072c-4beb-8f97-ea669492a184(a)x21g2000yqa.googlegroups.com, "sobriquet" <dohduhdah(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On 26 jun, 09:49, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: > [.. babbling ..] > > nazi cockroach <http://tinypic.com/r/fxqmh/6>
From: sid on 26 Jun 2010 17:40 Savageduck wrote: > > Sid > http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/125832813 > > This had great potential, but it appears over sharpen to me, and there > seems to be some noise or sharpening artifacts in the blue of the sky. > With those issues fixed this would have been in the superior category. > Thanks to you, Robert Spanjaard and Paul Furman for your constructive criticism,you have all pointed to the fact I should pay more attention when processing an image :) I hadn't noticed the speckles in the blue sky or the purple fringing, mainly because I didn't look closely enough. Based on the above here is a better version http://www.sidshouse.net/main.php?g2_itemId=13373 cheers -- sid RLU 300284 2010.1
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Prev: [SI] Wallpaper is hung! Next: [SI] New Mandates! Get 'em while they're hot! |