Warmest January Ever! (in Australia where January is summer!)
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Maybe WE Are The Aliens
Next: Politicians & Death: Earth's Global Changes Ignored Re: Warmest January Ever! (in Australia where January is summer!)
From: Veselye on 19 May 2010 16:02 On Wed, 19 May 2010 12:39:50 -0700 (PDT), Benj <bjacoby(a)iwaynet.net> wrote: >I've never seen so much bogus science being foisted on the public for >political purposes. While the global taxation con artists spin their tale of global warming, they're ignoring the real danger behind climate change. Scientific facts here: The Earth's Axis has shifted This has created severe changes in our global weather, seismic & volcanic activity... And it will get much worse. You need to know the facts & scientific details about these increasing global problems from authentic, verifiable sources. http://divulgence.net --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
From: Peter Webb on 20 May 2010 23:28 There are 192 nations in the UN, and 12 months per year. Every year there are 192 x 12 = 2,304 opportunities for a "warmest ever" month in a country, and as records only go back 100 years or so you would expect by mere chance that about 23 countries (2,304/100)would break a record for warmest month each year. So the fact that by chance you would expect this to occur 23 times a year makes the fact that it occured once, in Australia in April 2010, somewhat less than surprising or interesting. Good news however that the Arctic ice extent was the largest it has been for 10 years. As this is the bell-weather index used by many AGW believers, it shows considerable cooling. Although in practice my guess is that they will suddently decide that Arctic sea-ice extent is a flawed index, and find some other measure to try and prove the earth is still warming.
From: spudnik on 20 May 2010 23:54
not only that, but Australia is an island; I mean, waht is the highest mountain? not only was Ahrrenius's "model" never actually created, but there is a fatal assumption that was shown in the '30s to be an assumption, that glaciation requires "cooling." thusNso: maether decompreththing aether createth light waveth, and there'th too much thibbilanth in hear. A=mcc -- ba-doom! thusNso: on the wayside, one should preliminarily determine what a "beam" is, that is split by the beamsplitter; people, who habitually think of a particle, when use of the word, quantum, is made for the click of a geigercounter (well, those might be ions) or what ever. that is, a laser beam is just a very special case, a highly modified or shaped set of waves, or a standing wave of some sort, frequency, polarity of lightwaves ... not Newton's clacking balls! can a photon be only one cycle of light? thusNso: hey; maybe they'd let you look at your trophy with your old 3d glasses! thusNso: dood, my valu of pi is lots simpler to calculate than yours -- seven cans of beer & a string! thusNso: nice cartoon; is there only one beamsplitter in Sagnac? --Pi, the surfer's canonical value, is not constructible with a pair of compasses .. but, could be with a pair and a half of compasses; dyscuss. |