What a bunch of fooking idiots!
in [Cakewalk]
|
Prev: Free Mastering.
Next: Avast updates
From: Ben Goldman on 1 Feb 2010 16:44 John Braner wrote: > On 01/02/2010 20:41, Ben Goldman wrote: > > Ben Berman wrote: > > > > > Sue Morton wrote: > > > > But will a new soundcard work in the 64-bit system I don't have? > > > > > > Don't know if anyone's suggested this yet, but yes, it will, if > > > you wipe the drive, reformat in NTFS, and then reinstall using > > > WinXP 8-) > > > > > > bzb > > > > I've never heard it called a drive before. :P > > > > OK - he can reformat his wife in NTFS then, and change her to 64 bit > in the process - that ought to fix everything ;-) If I ever even tried to reformat my wife I would suffer a complete and total crash. My system might never be recoverable. :P -- Cheers, Ben
From: kitekrazy on 1 Feb 2010 17:25 On 1/31/2010 8:44 AM, Glennbo wrote: > In news:f4GdnXURWrpRsvjWnZ2dnUVZ_oadnZ2d(a)earthlink.com the killer robot > "Rick Paul"<rickpaul(a)earthlink.net> grabbed the controls of the > spaceship cakewalk.audio and pressed these buttons... > >> It's kind of like around here when someone posts something about >> SONAR, good or bad, and the thread turns into a Cakewalk-bashing, >> Reaper-loving rant. > > J-Bridge works in Reaper too. Except you don't really need it, coz the > native built-in bridge, writen by the DAW developer works. ;) > It sure does!!! Plugins like Reaper.
From: kitekrazy on 1 Feb 2010 17:26 On 1/31/2010 10:34 AM, Martin Holmes wrote: > The way I read it, the whole conversation was derailed by that CJ guy, > who doesn't seem to know very much. I clicked on his name, and it seems > he's made over 24,000 posts since he joined in 2006: > He's a prick. Total fanboy. > <http://forum.cakewalk.com/showprofile.aspx?memid=33776> > > That seems frankly insane. It's an average of over 20 posts a day, if my > math is right. He seems to have been posting every few minutes today. I > guess if he posted less and spent a bit of time learning a bit more, > he'd be more helpful. But you can't fault his commitment. It's amazing > he has time to make any music. > > Cheers, > Martin > > Rick Paul wrote: >> "Rick Paul" <rickpaul(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message >> news:f4GdnXURWrpRsvjWnZ2dnUVZ_oadnZ2d(a)earthlink.com... >>> Without getting into the fray over there, because someone really >>> needs to >> >> Well, I decided to get in the fray over there after all, posting a >> slightly reworded version of the technical part of my response. We'll >> see if it helps. I'm cautiously optimistic. >> >> Rick >>
From: kitekrazy on 1 Feb 2010 17:29 On 1/31/2010 8:24 PM, Kraig Olmstead wrote: > Part of it's just the fact that Sonar has a long history and it's > impossible to change the UI without upsetting existing users. To a > degree I'd be one of them. I've spent a lot of time learning to use > Sonar and To have to spend time relearning would be a pain. > Yeah, upset the ones who been using it since it was named Sonar. > I like a lot of what Sonar can do for me. I have stayed with it because > I have a lot of time and energy invested in it. > > Since I seem to be back into this, I'll probably be trying Reaper out soon. > > KO > > kitekrazy wrote: >> On 1/31/2010 8:58 AM, Glennbo wrote: >>> In news:hk453d$473$1(a)news.eternal-september.org the killer robot >>> kitekrazy >>> <kitekrazy(a)kitekrazy.org> grabbed the controls of the spaceship >>> cakewalk.audio and pressed these buttons... >>> >>>> Of all of the forums I've been to, the Cakewalk forum has the worst fan >>>> boys. >>> >>> I saw a thread there a while back where the original poster was told >>> that >>> their CPU was not up to snuff for Sonar. The guy had a brand new i7. >>> >> >> One of the developers at Image Line posted specs on % of price upgrade >> vs. % of increased performance. Some i7s that cost 50% more with only >> 20% more performance isn't worth it. >> >> The ignorance of an efficient DAW is increasing. People think you need >> to overclock. How did we ever manage to get anything done back in the >> single core days,under 3ghz and 1 gig of RAM? >> >> >> I bet if they could clean up that GUI, it would shave off resources. >> If you look at all of the other DAW apps, they have less buttons. >> >> I never understood their thinking when it comes to "features". Having >> a arpeggiator on each track is silly. The synths they package have >> that feature. >> >> There's many times I wanted to go to that forum and tell them to clean >> up the GUI. The last time I seen a post like that, a guy got really >> flamed. They even found a way to ruin that excellent piano roll. It >> took me awhile how to get rid of that annoying magnifying glass.
From: kitekrazy on 1 Feb 2010 17:30
On 2/1/2010 10:40 AM, Ben Berman wrote: > Sue Morton wrote: >> But will a new soundcard work in the 64-bit system I don't have? > > Don't know if anyone's suggested this yet, but yes, it will, if you wipe > the drive, reformat in NTFS, and then reinstall using WinXP 8-) > > bzb > I still remember Ted telling everyone to go back to W98 when XP came out. |