Prev: mixwizard schematics
Next: XENYX XL2400?
From: Arny Krueger on 4 Sep 2009 10:17
"Phil Allison" <phil_a(a)tpg.com.au> wrote in message
news:7gclhlF2oio58U1(a)mid.individual.net
> "Arny Krueger"
>
>>> that is not the inverse square law
>>
>> It's the intensity version of it.

>> What also happens is that energy and power falls off
>> with the square of the distance.

> ** SPL falls of with distance.

> That is, SPL is inversely proportional to distance.

With all of the profanity and anger removed Phil, you are right and I am
wrong.

Thanks Phil for the correction.


From: George's Pro Sound Co. on 4 Sep 2009 10:42

"Arny Krueger" <arnyk(a)hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:bPmdnSwjMpQMvDzXnZ2dnUVZ_jidnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
> "Phil Allison" <phil_a(a)tpg.com.au> wrote in message
> news:7gclhlF2oio58U1(a)mid.individual.net
>> "Arny Krueger"
>>
>>>> that is not the inverse square law
>>>
>>> It's the intensity version of it.
>
>>> What also happens is that energy and power falls off
>>> with the square of the distance.
>
>> ** SPL falls of with distance.
>
>> That is, SPL is inversely proportional to distance.
>
> With all of the profanity and anger removed Phil, you are right and I am
> wrong.
>
> Thanks Phil for the correction.

where is the Thanks George for proving me a idiot , yet again
George
>
>


 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: mixwizard schematics
Next: XENYX XL2400?