From: John Fields on
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:30:31 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>On a sunny day (Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:56:35 -0800) it happened D from BC
><myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote in <MPG.26033f321480b139896e5(a)209.197.12.12>:
>
>>6.5 digit multimeters sell around $1000.00.
>>For electronics development, are these $1000 multimeters really
>>necessary?
>>What are they good for?
>
>They are not needed, all you need is a 5 Euro multimeter,
>and in extreme cases a precise reference.
>That means if you use one of those reference chips, you borrow
>the very accurate multimeter for a day, measure your reference chip,
>write it down, and use that to calibrate your cheap multimeter,
>or o compute it's real value,
>Saved: 1000$

---
If you don't _need_ the accurate multimeter, then how do you get around
the fact that unless you use _it_ to measure the reference, your cheap
multimeter is pretty much a boat anchor?


JF
From: Fred Bartoli on
Jan Panteltje a �crit :
> On a sunny day (Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:56:35 -0800) it happened D from BC
> <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote in <MPG.26033f321480b139896e5(a)209.197.12.12>:
>
>> 6.5 digit multimeters sell around $1000.00.
>> For electronics development, are these $1000 multimeters really
>> necessary?

Depends on what you're doing (just got a 8.5 digits 3458A)

>> What are they good for?
>

Calibrate my 6.5 and 7.5 digits DMM? And few other things too...


> They are not needed, all you need is a 5 Euro multimeter,
> and in extreme cases a precise reference.
> That means if you use one of those reference chips, you borrow
> the very accurate multimeter for a day, measure your reference chip,
> write it down, and use that to calibrate your cheap multimeter,
> or o compute it's real value,
> Saved: 1000$
>
> Of course there are exceptions,
> but in places where that counts they usually have a lot of ++++expensive stuff anyways.
> Usually places where nothing really useful is done, like in CERN, or ITER, or LIGO,
> etc.
>

Trying to imply that since you have nothing more than a $5 DMM you're
doing useful things?
Then trash all your tools and you'll get really important...

--
Thanks,
Fred.
From: John Larkin on
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:30:31 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>On a sunny day (Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:56:35 -0800) it happened D from BC
><myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote in <MPG.26033f321480b139896e5(a)209.197.12.12>:
>
>>6.5 digit multimeters sell around $1000.00.
>>For electronics development, are these $1000 multimeters really
>>necessary?
>>What are they good for?
>
>They are not needed, all you need is a 5 Euro multimeter,
>and in extreme cases a precise reference.

Does your e5 multimeter resolve microvolts? If not, it's useless for
designing thermocouple stuff. Can it measure resistance to 0.02%? That
is useful too.

If all you do is muck around with uPs that have 8 bit ADCs, a cheap
meter is almost good enough.

One cool thing to do with a good DVM is measure voltage drops in PCB
traces and planes, often microvolts. That answers the eternal
question. "where is the damned current going?"

John

From: D from BC on
Neato :)


From: D from BC on
In article <ghfjp5d9k4u3nr23r4miuu3b85lshl4a7q(a)4ax.com>,
speffSNIP(a)interlogDOTyou.knowwhat says...
>
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:56:35 -0800, the renowned D from BC
> <myrealaddress(a)comic.com> wrote:
>
> >6.5 digit multimeters sell around $1000.00.
> >For electronics development, are these $1000 multimeters really
> >necessary?
> >What are they good for?
>
> If you're developing precise instruments, you would prefer to have
> test equipment that has higher (preferably MUCH higher) performance
> than the devices you are developing. Say you have designed a 0.1% or
> 0.01% current source for a sensor and want to confirm how much it
> drifts with temperature within 1%.
>
> It's not as easy when you approach or pass the limits of what has been
> done (or what you can afford to buy/rent/borrow) and you have figure
> out how the heck to test it.
>
> I don't see how a meter like that would be all that useful if you were
> only developing digital, audio or RF though.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Spehro Pefhany

Thanks :)