From: FUBARinSFO on 19 Dec 2009 00:04 Hi Haven't been here in a while, and I see the group bombed by all this spam. Isn't there a moderator or a spam filter to clean this stuff up. Too bad for the group, it seems. -- Roy
From: kony on 19 Dec 2009 01:57 On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:04:42 -0800 (PST), FUBARinSFO <file1303(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Hi > >Haven't been here in a while, and I see the group bombed by all this >spam. Isn't there a moderator or a spam filter to clean this stuff >up. Too bad for the group, it seems. > >-- Roy It's a public newsgroup so no moderators. There probably are spam filters on a per-server basis, apparently the one you access doesn't do enough. If the ones you see seem to have some pattern, you might try setting a newsreader up to filter and delete and/or not download based on that. Otherwise blame Google, they leave a wide open hole with easy to get, free google groups accounts. Sometimes I wonder if they even give preference to spammers that have business with them, after all they are in the advertising business so it would've seemed prudent to set up their groups service to filter out ads competitive to those of their paying customers. The above paragraph is a hint, the easiest way to filter at present is to just block all from google groups - get a proper newsreader and use a personal usenet account instead of google groups.
From: FUBARinSFO on 19 Dec 2009 04:14 Thanks, kony -- the screen I see comes via IE7/IE8 to groups.google.com/group/alt.comp.hardware/... Some spammers bomb some google groups, and makes them look like toilets instead of serious sources of problems and solutions. -- Roy
From: Paul on 19 Dec 2009 05:52 FUBARinSFO wrote: > Thanks, kony -- the screen I see comes via IE7/IE8 to > groups.google.com/group/alt.comp.hardware/... Some spammers bomb some > google groups, and makes them look like toilets instead of serious > sources of problems and solutions. > > -- Roy You can read news on free servers such as www.aioe.org or www.eternal-september.org . The first one has no authentication. The second one, you can apply for an account. Both are free, and are intended for low volume text-only. Perfect for reading news. The un-authenticated one, has an upper limit of 25 outgoing posts per day, and has extensive filters in place on outgoing (which annoy some of the more free-wheeling users). You use a newsreader with that, something which follows conventions well. In years past, it might have been something like Forte Agent. I'm using Mozilla.org Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 right now, and it works well. So with about ten minutes of work, you can be reading (somewhat) filtered content from a free private server. Yes, spam still leaks in, because the nature of NNTP protocol, makes it pretty hard to cover every possibility (short of being a mind reader). Comparing what I see on the free server, to the Google article list, there are fewer "shoe commercials" from China. But not down to zero. Since the servers are typically run by just one person, that person still sleeps at night. If there is a service outage, they're not paged or anything, and it may take a while until they resolve the service issue. It helps to have multiple servers in your newsreader program, to cover a service outage. I use the two suggested above. Paul
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Why Widescreen? Next: Refresh lost PS/2 mouse without reboot |