From: Brad C on 7 Jan 2010 11:33 As I sift through the disaster of upgrading from Q2007 H&B to Q2010 H&B, I have lots of time to ponder what may have happened. Situation: Since the QEL file apparently did *not* convert successfully, I face re-processing 800+ Quicken Bill Pay transactions (going back to 2004), which poured into my registers when I reconnected QBP in Q2010. I now get to spend New Year's week (several days) going thru each & every 800 transactions & re-matching, ignoring, accepting, etc. How could this have happened? If I had known that my 2007 data file(s) may have been compromised somehow, I could have taken measures beforehand, such as "validate" to avert this monumental bookkeeping disaster. But does "validate" handle files outside of QDF? Would validate have even helped with a failed QEL conversion ?? RE: Validating: (1) what does that do? Some of the documentation I've read says not to do this regularly. (2) Is there a downside to validating? (3) Does it compromise file integrity over time? (4) Is a report generated by validate every time or only if there is a problem? (5) Does validate self-correct problems? My data file is not as old as some (probably 8 years old), but I want to use whatever *best practices* are out there to assure the integrity of this file. It is 17 MB & goes back to Jan 06. (6) Does size of the file compromise integrity? Sorry about lengthy post, but I'm faced with huge disaster that should not happen to anyone.
From: Brad C on 15 Jan 2010 00:04 On Jan 7, 10:33 am, Brad C <bcoff...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > As I sift through the disaster of upgrading from Q2007 H&B to Q2010 > H&B, I have lots of time to ponder what may have happened. > > Situation: Since the QEL file apparently did *not* convert > successfully, I face re-processing 800+ Quicken Bill Pay transactions > (going back to 2004), which poured into my registers when I > reconnected QBP in Q2010. I now get to spend New Year's week (several > days) going thru each & every 800 transactions & re-matching, > ignoring, accepting, etc. > > How could this have happened? If I had known that my 2007 data file(s) > may have been compromised somehow, I could have taken measures > beforehand, such as "validate" to avert this monumental bookkeeping > disaster. But does "validate" handle files outside of QDF? Would > validate have even helped with a failed QEL conversion ?? > > RE: Validating: (1) what does that do? Some of the documentation I've > read says not to do this regularly. (2) Is there a downside to > validating? (3) Does it compromise file integrity over time? (4) Is a > report generated by validate every time or only if there is a problem? > (5) Does validate self-correct problems? > > My data file is not as old as some (probably 8 years old), but I want > to use whatever *best practices* are out there to assure the integrity > of this file. It is 17 MB & goes back to Jan 06. (6) Does size of the > file compromise integrity? > > Sorry about lengthy post, but I'm faced with huge disaster that should > not happen to anyone. My post above had important questions that apparently nobody on this listserve wanted to touch. There were several questions; however, they had to do with validation & ultimately *best practices* for upgrading versions of Quicken. At the Quicken Online Community, the questions were answered quickly and thoughtfully -- I would highly recommend them ...
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Q2009 QFX 401(k) Import Issues Next: Setting up a complex Paycheck in Quicken |