From: Steve on 29 Oct 2009 18:25 In article <8bkje51o03njv26f8p4vk6757kl4qd1feq@ 4ax.com>, Syfo-Dyas(a)nomail.com says... > > On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:04:13 -0700, Steve <ivalid(a)invalid.com> wrote: > > >In article <ujdee5lgr1kn98o92qst2hc8dusprs9adt(a)4ax.com>, Syfo- > >Dyas(a)nomail.com says... > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> A friend of mine has an intel cpu 8400 and I would like to know what > >> is the closest AMD equivalent to that processor. Another friend wants > >> the same or similar power and speed but hates intel. So he only wants > >> or prefers AMD. Do any of you experts on here know of the AMD > >> equivalent in power and speed of an intel 8400 3.0Ghz processor??? > >> > >> Thanks in Advance > > > >Does it have to be dual core? > > Yes! > > >Do you want the equivant in price, gigahertz or processing power? > > As I said in the post it has to have the same processign power... > It simply has to be as close as possible to the 8400. AMD Phenom II X2 550 Black Edition Callisto 3.1GHz Probably as close as you're going to get with a dual core. s
From: Syfo-Dyas on 29 Oct 2009 23:08 On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:25:22 -0700, Steve <invalid(a)invalid.com> wrote: >In article <8bkje51o03njv26f8p4vk6757kl4qd1feq@ >4ax.com>, Syfo-Dyas(a)nomail.com says... >> >> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:04:13 -0700, Steve <ivalid(a)invalid.com> wrote: >> >> >In article <ujdee5lgr1kn98o92qst2hc8dusprs9adt(a)4ax.com>, Syfo- >> >Dyas(a)nomail.com says... >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> A friend of mine has an intel cpu 8400 and I would like to know what >> >> is the closest AMD equivalent to that processor. Another friend wants >> >> the same or similar power and speed but hates intel. So he only wants >> >> or prefers AMD. Do any of you experts on here know of the AMD >> >> equivalent in power and speed of an intel 8400 3.0Ghz processor??? >> >> >> >> Thanks in Advance >> > >> >Does it have to be dual core? >> >> Yes! >> >> >Do you want the equivant in price, gigahertz or processing power? >> >> As I said in the post it has to have the same processign power... >> It simply has to be as close as possible to the 8400. > >AMD Phenom II X2 550 Black Edition Callisto >3.1GHz > >Probably as close as you're going to get with a >dual core. Thanks steve and to all who have responded....
From: Daniel Prince on 30 Oct 2009 09:53 "geoff" <nospam(a)nospam.com> wrote: >However, IMHO, software not specfically >written for multi-cores but is multi-threaded, as is a lot of software, >would still get a benefit from multiple cores (and not a slight or minor >one). Maybe we computer users could get together and compile a list of programs that are multi-threaded and list how many threads they use. A list of programs that are NOT multi-threaded would also be useful. -- I don't understand why they make gourmet cat foods. I have known many cats in my life and none of them were gourmets. They were all gourmands!
From: geoff on 30 Oct 2009 19:49 I think most software is multi-threaded because usually the UI runs in one thread and other operations run in different, other threads (but there is one main process). It is done that way so the UI does not lock up when saving a file, for example, in notepad. Testing one core with software that is not written for multi-cores, actually means testing a core with software that will not generate so many threads that another core is used via the OS's load balancing capability. --g
From: Syfo-Dyas on 4 Nov 2009 13:16 On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:50:02 +0800, "Dave C." <noway(a)nohow.never> wrote: >On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:08:47 -0400 >Syfo-Dyas <Syfo-Dyas(a)nomail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> A friend of mine has an intel cpu 8400 and I would like to know what >> is the closest AMD equivalent to that processor. Another friend wants >> the same or similar power and speed but hates intel. So he only wants >> or prefers AMD. Do any of you experts on here know of the AMD >> equivalent in power and speed of an intel 8400 3.0Ghz processor??? >> >> Thanks in Advance > >The closest performance match in a processor that is still widely >available is a Phenom II X3 720 (2.8GHz) which benchmarks slightly >better, even though it is slightly slower clock speed. Obviously the >extra core helps the Phenom II. But the interesting thing is, the >Phenom II X3 720 is significantly cheaper than an E8400. So if it's >E8400 performance you want, get a Phenom II X3 720 for less money. >Invest the savings in a better video card, perhaps? -Dave Thanks just saw this setup. Although it is a quad how do you think it rates??? http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/searchtools/item-Details.asp?EdpNo=5406477&sku=B69-0143&SRCCODE=WEM2074BY&cm_mmc=Email-_-Main-_-WEM2074-_-components
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Power controller chip to turn on ATX Next: need help sharing a Canon printer on Windows 7 |