What is the biggest size of Molecule?
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Physics Group Splinters Over Global Warming Review
Next: TV shows like "Mentalist" is possible only in Brain Locus theory #24 Brain as Radio Receiver Theory
From: dlzc on 29 Dec 2009 14:14 Dear BradGuth: On Dec 29, 11:34 am, BradGuth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: .... > How about our government and whatever public > funded physics and science sharing the best > available truths without systematic > obfuscation or any intentions as to withholding > or deceiving us? Much simpler to allow for simple paranoia to supply all the misdirection required to prevent unbridled growth in knowledge. > It seems that many here do not even allow > for 2D image interpreting, much less 3D. Not for long. > How is your photographic deductive > interpreting/observationology ? Pretty good. I can still find Waldo... David A. Smith
From: BradGuth on 29 Dec 2009 15:39 On Dec 29, 11:14 am, dlzc <dl...(a)cox.net> wrote: > Dear BradGuth: > > On Dec 29, 11:34 am, BradGuth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > ... > > > How about our government and whatever public > > funded physics and science sharing the best > > available truths without the usual systematic > > obfuscation or any intentions as to withholding > > or deceiving us? > > Much simpler to allow for simple paranoia to supply all the > misdirection required to prevent unbridled growth in knowledge. By way of mainstream obfuscation/(excluding of facts or evidence) is how you can get and sustain whatever degree of paranoia, more than enough in order to start and sustain wars. By applied disinformation and various infowar tactics is how you would establish and embellish whatever ruse/sting that your social/political or faith-based mainstream intends to get away with. > > > It seems that many here do not even allow > > for 2D image interpreting, much less 3D. > > Not for long. It has been decades too long as is. > > > How is your photographic deductive > > interpreting/observationology ? > > Pretty good. I can still find Waldo... > > David A. Smith In that case, find Waldo on Venus. IrfanView http://www.irfanview.com/ The original GIF image file: http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif ~ BG
From: John Stafford on 29 Dec 2009 15:46 http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/7IQ9Sf/www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/12/func tional-molecular-transistor/
From: BradGuth on 29 Dec 2009 16:05 On Dec 29, 12:46 pm, John Stafford <n...(a)droffats.net> wrote: > http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/7IQ9Sf/www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/12/... > tional-molecular-transistor/ How large is that "molecular-transistor"? Otherwise, help us find Waldo on Venus. IrfanView http://www.irfanview.com/ The original GIF image file: http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif ~ BG
From: tadchem on 29 Dec 2009 16:27
On Dec 29, 1:04 pm, Sanny <softtank...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Which is the largest molecule man have found? > > H-Ch-Ch-Ch---- ..... > > Is there any inorganic molecule that is quite large? If you define a molecule as an unbroken string of atoms and /or ions attached to each other, then try a crystal of gypsum: abnout 9 m long and 50 tonnes(!) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/3269047/Worlds-largest-crystal-discovered-in-Mexican-cave.html > Does large molecules have special charactistics. Silly question, even for you, Sanny. > I hope Rubber/ Plastics/ Fats/ ... Are having large molecules. They are called 'polymers.' > Is Protien a Molecule? Yes. The woprd is spelled "protein". Correct spelling is VERY important in chemistry. > Whats the Chemical structure of Protien? A sequence of amino acids connected in a chain by a particiular class of bonds called peptide bonds: http://xray.bmc.uu.se/~kurs/BiostrukfunkX2/practicals/practical_1/figs/peptide_bond.jpg > How is Protien molecule formed? I read Cells are made of Protien > Molecules. Usually protein moelcules are formed inside living cells using recipes encoded in DNA. > Does a Protien molecule has a life? No. > If protien is found on some planet will that mean that planet has some > life? It means that the planet *COULD* support life as we know it. It says nothing about life as we *DON'T* know it. > Yesterday I read that Benjene You mean "benzene" I presume. To show you about that warning I gave you earlier about spelling, "benzine' is not the same substance as "benzene." > molecule between two gold molecules act > as a electronic Transitor. So In future we may have single molecule > Transistors. They will make our computers 100 times faster. The 'future' is here todday: http://www.upi.com/Science_News/2009/12/28/Single-molecule-transistor-created/UPI-22521262032655/ > However even todays computers are fast enough to handle any task. They still can't predict the weather (temperature, pressure wind, humidity) a week ahead. or 40 years ahead,or 100 years ahead.... They can't even account for clouds. > I > dont think there is any need of faster computer for ordinary man. > However for researchers fast computers are needed to simulate research > events. > > Bye > Sanny Tom Davidson Richmond, VA |