Prev: I've read about "adaptive optics" as used by the US military, intelligence agencies, etc in satellite imagery, but what about using optics to correct out of focus pictures? Is this possible?
Next: The 17th Korean Air Traval Photo Contast
From: Ofnuts on 12 Jul 2010 03:03 On 12/07/2010 07:45, Scotius wrote: > Do publishers use highly advance monitors or > super-knowledgeable graphics professionals who know how things will > turn out even if they can't preview them? One of the reasons lies in the lack of computational accuracy during editing, that rears its ugly head as a the "combed histogram": http://www.photoreview.com.au/tips/editing/combed-histograms.aspx -- Bertrand
From: Paul Furman on 12 Jul 2010 22:46
Ofnuts wrote: > Scotius wrote: > >> Do publishers use highly advance monitors or >> super-knowledgeable graphics professionals who know how things will >> turn out even if they can't preview them? > > One of the reasons lies in the lack of computational accuracy during > editing, that rears its ugly head as a the "combed histogram": > > http://www.photoreview.com.au/tips/editing/combed-histograms.aspx Same issues that raw files help with. Dark blue and/or red/yellow sunset skies with gradual transitions are the worst. If the initial exposure and lighting is good, there's no benefit. |