What mic likely?
in [Live Sound]
|
Prev: Allen & Heath GL4000 meter pod issue
Next: For Phildo
From: Eeyore on 30 Sep 2008 11:28 George's ProSound Company wrote: > Here ya go you useless turd > Eyeore, Graham someoneoranother has BRAGGED on alt.audio.pro.live-sound > about STEALING qsc's mechanical design for chassis construction while it was > under valid patent > by his own admission he is a industrial thief. Pardon ? I borrowed one tiny aspect of their lid construction. Not even in full, it just gave me a similar design idea. I suppose next you'll be saying I'm an industrial thief for copying the idea of using screws to hold it on ? Stick to what you know you're talking about George. Oh and what about Behringer copying ? Accepted in a UK court. That's OK is it ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 30 Sep 2008 11:33 "Ron(UK)" wrote: > George's ProSound Company wrote: > > Here ya go you useless turd > > Eyeore, Graham someoneoranother has BRAGGED on alt.audio.pro.live-sound > > about STEALING qsc's mechanical design for chassis construction while it was > > under valid patent > > by his own admission he is a industrial thief. > > At which point does using someone elses good idea become theft. If that > feature isn't a copyrighted part of the design surely anyone can use it? Well it wasn't a copy anyway, just a design 'hint'. In any event you cannot copyright or patent concepts or methods that are either common usage, obvious or already in the public domain. In this instance it was both obvious and in the public domain and unprotected. I don't know what's made George go off his rocker out of the blue like this. Maybe it's him and Phildo doing their gang act again ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 30 Sep 2008 11:35 George's ProSound Company wrote: > "Ron(UK)" <ron(a)lunevalleyaudio.com> wrote > > > George's ProSound Company wrote: > >> Here ya go you useless turd > >> Eyeore, Graham someoneoranother has BRAGGED on alt.audio.pro.live-sound > >> about STEALING qsc's mechanical design for chassis construction while it > >> was under valid patent > >> by his own admission he is a industrial thief. > > > > At which point does using someone elses good idea become theft. If that > > feature isn't a copyrighted part of the design surely anyone can use it? > > it was under copyright, Only the circuitry that Uli 's company happily copied. > and current patent by eyesores own addmission Not the mechanical construction. Nor would it have got a patent since the principle is 'obvious'. Lean some patent and copyright law. Graham
From: Eeyore on 30 Sep 2008 11:37 "Ron(UK)" wrote: > George's ProSound Company wrote: > > "Ron(UK)" <ron(a)lunevalleyaudio.com> wrote > > > >> George's ProSound Company wrote: > >>> Here ya go you useless turd > >>> Eyeore, Graham someoneoranother has BRAGGED on alt.audio.pro.live-sound > >>> about STEALING qsc's mechanical design for chassis construction while it > >>> was under valid patent > >>> by his own admission he is a industrial thief. > >>> > >> At which point does using someone elses good idea become theft. If that > >> feature isn't a copyrighted part of the design surely anyone can use it? > > > > it was under copyright, and current patent by eyesores own addmission > > In that case, "He`s not the Messiah... He`s a very naughty boy!" George is just talking complete bollocks encouraged by Phildo no doubt. I think they're teaming up for another vendetta. Graham
From: Ron(UK) on 30 Sep 2008 11:40
Eeyore wrote: > > George's ProSound Company wrote: > >> Here ya go you useless turd >> Eyeore, Graham someoneoranother has BRAGGED on alt.audio.pro.live-sound >> about STEALING qsc's mechanical design for chassis construction while it was >> under valid patent >> by his own admission he is a industrial thief. > > Pardon ? I borrowed one tiny aspect of their lid construction. Not even in full, > it just gave me a similar design idea. > > I suppose next you'll be saying I'm an industrial thief for copying the idea of > using screws to hold it on ? > > Stick to what you know you're talking about George. > > Oh and what about Behringer copying ? Accepted in a UK court. That's OK is it ? > OH Gawd! we're not going down that road again are we? Ron |