From: Nam Nguyen on
Alan Smaill wrote:
> Nam Nguyen <namducnguyen(a)shaw.ca> writes:
>
>> Alan Smaill wrote:
>>> Nam Nguyen <namducnguyen(a)shaw.ca> writes:
>>>
>
>>>> The ultimate logic is one which is relativistic.
>>> Is that an absolute truth, then?
>>>
>>> I know, it's an old ploy, but your position just begs the question.
>>>
>> No. It's relative to what we, mortal beings, are entitled to know and to
>> what existence realm we happen to be in.
>
> But that's just your subjective opinion of the situation, isn't it?

That's why nothing is an absolute truth, absolutely true independent of
any opinion, observation, perception, endowed ability, etc..

>
>> A lone man is walking in a road that seems to stretch to nowhere. Is the
>> evening lonely, or is that just a lonely feeling in the evening?
>
> The man is very happy.

Relatively speaking of course.


From: Nam Nguyen on
Nam Nguyen wrote:
> Alan Smaill wrote:
>> Nam Nguyen <namducnguyen(a)shaw.ca> writes:
>>
>>> Alan Smaill wrote:
>>>> Nam Nguyen <namducnguyen(a)shaw.ca> writes:
>>>>
>>
>>>>> The ultimate logic is one which is relativistic.
>>>> Is that an absolute truth, then?
>>>>
>>>> I know, it's an old ploy, but your position just begs the question.
>>>>
>>> No. It's relative to what we, mortal beings, are entitled to know and to
>>> what existence realm we happen to be in.
>>
>> But that's just your subjective opinion of the situation, isn't it?
>
> That's why nothing is an absolute truth, absolutely true independent of
> any opinion, observation, perception, endowed ability, etc..

Iow, welcome to this statement: "This statement is relatively/subjectively true".

From: Nam Nguyen on
Nam Nguyen wrote:
> Alan Smaill wrote:
>> Nam Nguyen <namducnguyen(a)shaw.ca> writes:
>>
>>> Alan Smaill wrote:
>>>> Nam Nguyen <namducnguyen(a)shaw.ca> writes:
>>>>
>>
>>>>> The ultimate logic is one which is relativistic.
>>>> Is that an absolute truth, then?
>>>>
>>>> I know, it's an old ploy, but your position just begs the question.
>>>>
>>> No. It's relative to what we, mortal beings, are entitled to know and to
>>> what existence realm we happen to be in.
>>
>> But that's just your subjective opinion of the situation, isn't it?
>
> That's why nothing is an absolute truth, absolutely true independent of
> any opinion, observation, perception, endowed ability, etc..

Of course abstraction (mathematical or otherwise) is a form of subjective
opinion.

Seriously, if you could demonstrate a truly absolute abstract truth in mathematical
reasoning, I'd leave the forum never coming back.
From: Nam Nguyen on
Nam Nguyen wrote:
> Nam Nguyen wrote:
>> Alan Smaill wrote:
>>> Nam Nguyen <namducnguyen(a)shaw.ca> writes:
>>>
>>>> Alan Smaill wrote:
>>>>> Nam Nguyen <namducnguyen(a)shaw.ca> writes:
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>> The ultimate logic is one which is relativistic.
>>>>> Is that an absolute truth, then?
>>>>>
>>>>> I know, it's an old ploy, but your position just begs the question.
>>>>>
>>>> No. It's relative to what we, mortal beings, are entitled to know
>>>> and to
>>>> what existence realm we happen to be in.
>>>
>>> But that's just your subjective opinion of the situation, isn't it?
>>
>> That's why nothing is an absolute truth, absolutely true independent of
>> any opinion, observation, perception, endowed ability, etc..
>
> Of course abstraction (mathematical or otherwise) is a form of subjective
> opinion.
>
> Seriously, if you could demonstrate a truly absolute abstract truth in
> mathematical reasoning, I'd leave the forum never coming back.

If you can't (general "you") then I'm sorry: my duty to the Zen council,
so to speak, is to see to it that "absolute" truths such as G(PA) is a
thing of the past, if not of oblivion.
From: MoeBlee on
On Mar 26, 3:11 pm, Nam Nguyen <namducngu...(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
> if you could demonstrate a truly absolute abstract truth in mathematical
> reasoning, I'd leave the forum never coming back.

Oh, sweet seduction, please don't tempt me so!

MoeBlee