'When Are Relations Neither True Nor False? [Logic]

Prev: geometry precisely defining ellipsis and how infinity is in the midsection #427 Correcting Math
Next: Accounting for Governmental and Nonprofit Entities, 15th Edition Earl Wilson McGraw Hill Test bank is available at affordable prices. Email me at allsolutionmanuals11[at]gmail.com if you need to buy this. All emails will be answered ASAP.

From: Aatu Koskensilta on 19 Feb 2010 10:22

Nam Nguyen <namducnguyen(a)shaw.ca> writes:

> Aatu Koskensilta wrote:
>
>> Thread titles are irrelevant.
>
> Huh? So "On formally undecidable propositions of Principia Mathematica
> and related systems" is irrelevant to what Godel wrote in his 1931
> paper? This is a very strange idea you have there!

I'm afraid I find your thought processes utterly unfathomable.

> You summarily dismissed Calvin's appropriately mentioning of CH in this
> thread topic, on the ground that it's philosophical, which I don't see
> as justified at all.

You're imagining things.

> I hope that you'd now see that point.

Alas, no.

--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta(a)uta.fi)

"Wovon man nicht sprechan kann, dar�ber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus

From: Aatu Koskensilta on 19 Feb 2010 10:26

Nam Nguyen <namducnguyen(a)shaw.ca> writes:

> Look guys, you and AK, there's nothing wrong with the title question
> "When Are Relations Neither True Nor False?".

Dear NN, I haven't said there's anything wrong with the title.

> And this has been explained already. Your guys just desired to ignore
> it. That's all.

We may as well say that logical midgets sing beautifully. See the
midget? See his little feet? Beautiful!

--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta(a)uta.fi)

"Wovon man nicht sprechan kann, dar�ber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus

From: Aatu Koskensilta on 19 Feb 2010 10:28

Nam Nguyen <namducnguyen(a)shaw.ca> writes:

> There's time for crying, but there's also time for facing the truth.
> One would say.

There is a time for everything, and a season for every activity under
heaven:

a time to be born and a time to die, a time to plant and a time to
uproot,

a time to kill and a time to heal, a time to tear down and a time to
build,

a time to weep and a time to laugh, a time to mourn and a time to
dance,

a time to scatter stones and a time to gather them, a time to embrace
and a time to refrain,

a time to search and a time to give up, a time to keep and a time to
throw away,

a time to tear and a time to mend, a time to be silent and a time to
speak,

a time to love and a time to hate, a time for war and a time for peace.

Or so I've heard.

--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta(a)uta.fi)

"Wovon man nicht sprechan kann, dar�ber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus

From: Aatu Koskensilta on 19 Feb 2010 10:30

Newberry <newberryxy(a)gmail.com> writes:

> You are asking me way too many questions: What gave me this peculiar
> idea? Why it is an objection? What is the objection against? I do not
> have a clue.

Why then go on about such matters?

--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta(a)uta.fi)

"Wovon man nicht sprechan kann, dar�ber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus

From: Marshall on 19 Feb 2010 12:57

On Feb 19, 7:22 am, Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensi...(a)uta.fi> wrote:
> Nam Nguyen <namducngu...(a)shaw.ca> writes:
>
> > You summarily dismissed Calvin's appropriately mentioning of CH in this
> > thread topic, on the ground that it's philosophical, which I don't see
> > as justified at all.
>
> You're imagining things.

His imagination is very vivid, and often entirely automatic.

Marshall