From: GregS on 9 Jul 2010 14:09 I can't find the camera here, yet it seems to view everything ?? http://www.fullscreen360.com/st-helens.htm
From: GregS on 9 Jul 2010 14:14 In article <i17ohv$26u$1(a)usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>, zekfrivo(a)zekfrivolous.com (GregS) wrote: >I can't find the camera here, yet it seems to view everything ?? > >http://www.fullscreen360.com/st-helens.htm > It does look like somebody walked in a circle. Then filled in shot ??
From: Savageduck on 9 Jul 2010 14:38 On 2010-07-09 11:14:33 -0700, zekfrivo(a)zekfrivolous.com (GregS) said: > In article <i17ohv$26u$1(a)usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>, > zekfrivo(a)zekfrivolous.com (GregS) wrote: >> I can't find the camera here, yet it seems to view everything ?? >> >> http://www.fullscreen360.com/st-helens.htm >> > > It does look like somebody walked in a circle. > Then filled in shot ?? I think your answer might lie here; http://www.gigapansystems.com/ http://www.gigapan.org/ -- Regards, Savageduck
From: Mark Sieving on 9 Jul 2010 14:42 On Jul 9, 1:09 pm, zekfr...(a)zekfrivolous.com (GregS) wrote: > I can't find the camera here, yet it seems to view everything ?? > > http://www.fullscreen360.com/st-helens.htm I'm not sure what the question is. The camera was clearly mounted on the edge of the crater, and pivoted through 360 degrees. Unless someone was holding up a mirror, the camera can't photograph itself. The technique would be to take a series of overlapping frames, and then stitch them together.
From: GregS on 9 Jul 2010 15:28 In article <d9ee2a91-2b3d-4c9f-8ea5-d24f3a5fda93(a)y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, Mark Sieving <mark_sieving(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Jul 9, 1:09=A0pm, zekfr...(a)zekfrivolous.com (GregS) wrote: >> I can't find the camera here, yet it seems to view everything ?? >> >> http://www.fullscreen360.com/st-helens.htm > >I'm not sure what the question is. The camera was clearly mounted on >the edge of the crater, and pivoted through 360 degrees. Unless >someone was holding up a mirror, the camera can't photograph itself. > >The technique would be to take a series of overlapping frames, and >then stitch them together. You did not go full up and down. From what i gather many frames were shot to get shots. Ther is NO view of the picture left untaken. Aparently the camera was moved and then more fill in shots were stitched together. It as if the camera is floating in mid air. Nothing below it, nothing above it. greg
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Can anybody recommend a good 24" monitor? Next: P&S's suck, and it isn't just noise or DR |