From: Robert Baer on
Glen Walpert wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 03:43:14 -0800, Robert Baer wrote:
>
> <clip>
>
>> Ghaa..lumens, candela, lux, candlepower, percent efficiency, and who
>> knows what else (watts per steradian?)!
>> Seems every maker uses a different "standard" not only for different
>> LEDs they make, but also different than other makers.
>> What are the relationships and the conversions? My basic questions
>> concerning a given LED would be how bright is it -
>> can i depend on the number given to tell one is brighter than another at
>> the same drive (seems the answer is NO).
>
> The answer is 42. Err, make that:
>
> <http://www.optics.arizona.edu/Palmer/rpfaq/rpfaq.pdf>
> <http://www.optics.arizona.edu/Palmer/rpfaq/rpfaq.htm>
>
> This is the most clear and unambiguous measurement of light primer in
> existence, with excellent references for more info. IMNSHO.
>
> Regards,
> Glen
>
SUPER!!
Straight-forward, feet on the ground source!
Thank you VERY much!
From: Robert Baer on
Don Klipstein wrote:
> In <AMednZFqgeF3r-TWnZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d(a)posted.localnet>, Robert Baer wrote:
>> Don Klipstein wrote:
>
> (What I wrote including quotation of previously quoted material)
>
>> Ghaa..lumens, candela, lux, candlepower, percent efficiency, and who
>> knows what else (watts per steradian?)!
>> Seems every maker uses a different "standard" not only for different
>> LEDs they make, but also different than other makers.
>> What are the relationships and the conversions?
>> My basic questions concerning a given LED would be how bright is it -
>> can i depend on the number given to tell one is brighter than another at
>> the same drive (seems the answer is NO).
>
> LEDs rated 1 watt or more are normally rated in lumens at specific drive
> current, often either 350 mA or more than one drive current including 350
> mA.
>
> Most LEDs with maximum current 50 mA or less are rated in millicandela
> or candela at a specified drive current, usually 20 mA. A candela is a
> lumen per steradian.
> (The lumen is defined in terms of the candela and steradian, rather than
> a candela being defined as 1 lumen per steradian, but I digress.)
>
> My experience suggests that many LEDs with maximum current 40 to 300 mA
> have the manufacturer stating both candela/millicandela and lumens.
>
> In my experience, most LEDs in Digi-Key's online catalog have both
> figures listed. It appears to me that if the manufacturer supplies one
> and not the other along with a nominal beam width, then the other is
> obtained using an equation that oversimplifies by assuming the beam is
> uniform and 100% of the light is in the beam - usually not far off for
> most LEDs rated *honestly* for beam width and beam width at least 30
> degrees.
>
> As for what a lux is: That is candela divided by square of distance in
> meters.
>
> - Don Klipstein (don(a)misty.com)
What got me started with the complaint, was seeing a listing from one
maker that used almost every one of the "units" i mentioned, and the
straw that broke this camel's back was percent efficiency (and who in
the h*ll knows what that is _supposed_ to mean)!