From: Esa Riihonen on

Mike Cavedon kirjoitti:

Who is Mike Cavedeon?
Why does he 'answer' with the same repetitive nonsense as mpc755?


> Path: aioe.org!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-
media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!
postnews.google.com!m4g2000vbl.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> From: Mike Cavedon <mikecavedon(a)gmail.com>
> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
> Subject: Re: Zero Size Physics, revisited
> Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 19:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> Lines: 122
> Message-ID: <74fbadf8-e24d-4217-9bed-
e8e9abf97a89(a)m4g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>
> References: <7b4d8a3f-efdb-42ac-a5f3-
ca5cf8275daf(a)g1g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
>
<d2666bde-6fda-4166-86ac-007b358e881d(a)m21g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>
> <db407c11-5f02-4236-ba0a-eecb8c53cff3(a)5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>
> <a6153017-7179-4a6a-
b7bf-165458af68ff(a)w31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
>
<13130bc6-8210-4a9c-8d4a-5c7c5fb99d1d(a)y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
> <0a2fa99f-372e-4bcf-
b6e9-0f36f935c641(a)i28g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
> <4093d65a-93aa-4404-a65c-b96d9bb1c9b4(a)u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 98.217.7.38
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1275619463 29099 127.0.0.1 (4 Jun 2010
02:44:23 GMT)
> X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse(a)google.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 02:44:23 +0000 (UTC)
> Complaints-To: groups-abuse(a)google.com
> Injection-Info: m4g2000vbl.googlegroups.com; posting-host=98.217.7.38;
> posting-account=thQQnAoAAADeXQviaVn4zRrQhlyLLh8O
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1;
GTB6.4;
> (R1 1.6); .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR
3.0.04506.30; .NET
> CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR
3.5.30729),gzip(gfe)
> Xref: aioe.org sci.physics.relativity:102947
>
> On Jun 3, 9:03 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Jun 3, 7:41 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Jun 3, 7:36 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > On Jun 3, 7:28 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > On Jun 3, 8:17 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > On May 29, 6:28 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > On May 29, 7:21 am, eon <ynes9...(a)techemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > the predictors says that all particles are
> > > > > > > > zero size, dimensions disappears !
> >
> > > > > > > > no lengths, areas, volumes and space
> > > > > > > > at particles level, say under 100 pico
> >
> > > > > > > > so if no volume, no space, no dimensions !!!
> >
> > > > > > > > how then does a particle knows in which
> > > > > > > > direction she must travel ???
> >
> > > > > > > > i wish i could understand
> >
> > > > > > > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics
> > > > > > > by the double solution theory
> > > > > > > Louis deBROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/
aflb124p001.pdf
> >
> > > > > > > 'I called this relation, which determines the particle's
motion in the
> > > > > > > wave, "theguidanceformula". It may easily be generalized to
the case
> > > > > > > of an external field acting on the particle.'
> >
> > > > > > > 'The particle when in motion on its wave, thus has its
vibration
> > > > > > > constantly in phase with that of the wave. This result may
be
> > > > > > > interpreted by noticing that, in the present theory, the
particle is
> > > > > > > de¯ned as a very small region of the wave where the
amplitude is very
> > > > > > > large, and it therefore seems quite natural that the
internal motion
> > > > > > > rythm of the particle should always be the same as that of
the wave at
> > > > > > > the point where the particle is located. A very important
point must
> > > > > > > be underlined here. For this interpretation of
theguidanceto be
> > > > > > > acceptable, the dimensions of the minute singular region
constituting
> > > > > > > the particle ought to be very small compared to the
wavelength of the
> > > > > > > v wave.'
> >
> > > > > > > The 'particle' occupies a very small region of its
associated wave.
> > > > > > > The external field acting on the particle is the aether.
> >
> > > > > > > A moving particle has an associated aether wave.
> >
> > > > > > > The particle and the wave act as one.
> >
> > > > > > The particle is what is seen.  
> >
> > > > > The particle is what is detected.
> >
> > > > > > It figures with "seeing" physics like
> > > > > > Einstein's relativity.  Wave physics, on the other hand, is
the
> > > > > > mechanical physics, like radar, which has inherent delay-
because it
> > > > > > is measured in terms of the instrument.
> >
> > > > It depends on what machine you use.
> >
> > > It depends on the experiment you are performing and what machine you
> > > use to measure it.
> >
> > Its very difficult to separate the particle from the wave. But, there
> > are instances where the particle rules the model- also there are
> > instances where the wave rules the model- it depends on the usefulness
> > of the model to man.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> de Broglie said it best.
>
> 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics
> by the double solution theory
> Louis de BROGLIE'
> http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf
>
> "The particle when in motion on its wave, thus has its vibration
> constantly in phase with that of the wave. This result may be
> interpreted by noticing that, in the present theory, the particle is
> defined as a very small region of the wave where the amplitude is
> very
> large, and it therefore seems quite natural that the internal motion
> rythm of the particle should always be the same as that of the wave
> at
> the point where the particle is located. A very important point must
> be underlined here. For this interpretation of the guidance to be
> acceptable, the dimensions of the minute singular region constituting
> the particle ought to be very small compared to the wavelength of the
> v wave."
>
> "I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in
> the
> wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the
> case
> of an external field acting on the particle."
>
> The 'particle' occupies a very small region of its associated wave.
> The external field acting on the particle is the aether.
>
> A moving particle has an associated aether wave.


Esa(R)

--
There is no logical foundation of mathematics, and Gödel has proved it!