Prev: Feck off, oh hypocritical gold obsessive, liitle brained, foull impious alien. NT
Next: How to get rich
From: hanson on 10 Jun 2010 23:46
in "How to get rich" "Tom Potter" <xprivatnews(a)mailinator.com> wrote:
I see in the news that up to 40,000 barrels of oil per day
are being spilled into the Gulf.
>
hanson wrote:
With a daily US oil consumption reported to be
aprox. 20 million bbl/day and the above is leaking
at 40 thousand bbl/day, that means some 500 such
oil wells are needed to give the US oil independence.
>
Google says that there are more then 2'500 active
oil wells operating in the USA....
>
So what is that BIG political thing again, about the
US not having enough domestic oil production?
>
..... ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ahahahanson

From: lorad on 11 Jun 2010 03:02
On Jun 10, 11:46 pm, "hanson" <han...(a)quick.net> wrote:
> in "How to get rich" "Tom Potter" <xprivatn...(a)mailinator.com> wrote:
> I see in the news that up to 40,000 barrels of oil per day
> are being spilled into the Gulf.
>
> hanson wrote:
>
> With a daily US oil consumption reported to be
> aprox. 20 million bbl/day and the above is leaking
> at 40 thousand bbl/day, that means some 500 such
>  oil wells are needed to give the US oil independence.
>
> Google says that there are more then 2'500 active
> oil wells operating in the USA....  
>
> So what  is that BIG political thing again, about the
> US not having enough domestic oil production?
>
> .... ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ahahahanson

The BP fatcat himself just stated that BP has 503 active wells
pumping..
From: Thomas on 11 Jun 2010 08:16
It would work if BP had not poisoned their poison.
From: spudnik on 11 Jun 2010 18:28
coal should be reserved as a feedstock;
it makes an excellent fertilizer, combined with gravelflour e.g..
yes; some burning could be stopped with modern nukes,
use some of the "DU" and thorium etc.

oil is not neccesarily as old as the permeable rocks
that it's found in, and it's probably not fossilized. oil is created
at the rate of biomass production run-off; so,
what's the sustainable rate?

> Mother nature is capable of far greater destruction than mankind. In
> any given year there is 0.5% chance that a volcano like Kakla will
> erupt. I'm hoping that Kakla will blow in the near future. That will
> create toxic ash that will ground air travel for two years. That will
> put all the environmental elites to shame. They will see the true
> malevolent face of Mother Nature.

thus&so:
OK, I'll tell you the first one that I heard Griffith say,
at the end of his 9/11/2001 Truth talk:
that it was absurd that a terrorist could cut your throat
with a box-cutter, when it was legal to have one
in commercial flight.

thus&so:
sounds interesting, but I doubt that you will get much of a reading,
since M&M et sequentia did not -- but, it was *a* reading. now,
you'd probably call that, entrained aether, but I really don't
see any need for such in "electromagnetism
with no Pascalian (perfect) vacuum" (and I recall reading,
the air is half hydrogen, 500 miles out e.g.)

> I can get Earth’s speed and direction without reference to any stars!

thus&so:
I read [*] the name of the unindicted co-conspirator
of HDubya in Iran-contra, Oliver "Buck" Revell,
who laid down the law at the NSF meeting,
that "global" cooling would henceforth not be funded. see,
I put that word in scare-quotes, becuase it was the self-
same flat-map miscomprehension of insolation
-- merely the differential from pole to equator --
that presupposes that glaciation requires a lesser temperature,
or that deglaciation'd require a greater one.
*
http://tarpley.net/online-books/george-bush-the-unauthorized-biography/

--Stop BP's and Waxman's arbitrageur's delight,
the cap&trade that the WSUrinal *calls*, Captain Tax (but,
there seems to be no provision for goment revenues )-!...
Fermat's Next Theorem: http://wlym.com
From: hanson on 12 Jun 2010 03:10
Sidebar: --- hanson asks: ----
Are you the same "Mike Vandeman" <MikeVandeman(a)hushmail.com>
who used to have this sig or ps in each one of his posts?:
||V|| I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
||V|| humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous
||V|| 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
>
hanson wrote:
That poster Vandeman posted this "8 years" for about
15 years... during which time he railed against mountain
bikers like a fanatical environmental mad man ....
In your rather interesting & rational item yesterday, you
posted the following lines:
>
Mike wrote:
||||| The problem is the cry baby environmentalists.
||||| the environmentalists would not permit domestic drilling.
||||| The problem is the damn environmental elitists.
||||| put all the environmental elites to shame.
||||| Environmentism will be terminated with extreme prejudice.
||||| Then we can get on with our lives [like] in the 1950's,
||||| before the invention of environmentalism.
>
hanson wrote:
Now tell me, Mikey, what was it that made you see
red about Green now? This is wonderful news and
you are most certainly not the first one to defect from
the Enviros' Green camp. Let me know what triggered
your switch. There are a lot of folks who'd like to see
some rational and critical way of how to live without
all that corrupt & hysterical Greenism. You could help.
Take care, Mikey.
hanson
>
PS:
Time and fancy permitting I may continue discussing
the oil issue, given the interesting responses from
Frank Logullo, Al Schwartz, LSMFT, lorad, and you.



--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Feck off, oh hypocritical gold obsessive, liitle brained, foull impious alien. NT
Next: How to get rich