From: John R. Carroll on 15 May 2010 11:08 Joe788 wrote: > On May 14, 6:19 pm, Joe788 <larryro...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> In a nut shell it's because Jon Banquer knows what he's talking about >> and has spent the time documenting it with specifics... unlike any of >> the worthless, lying scumbags who have posted in this thread. >> >> Who's going to be the next major source to come out and say how much >> they appreciate the efforts Jon Banquer makes and that they want his >> input? > > Jon, the only person agreeing with you is agreeing with you because > he's just as clueless as you. > > Wasn't Synchronous Technology supposed to take over the world already? > Or was that buzzword already replaced by "Inventor Fusion." > > LOL! Since when are the two that apparently agreed with him a "major source" and what are they suposed to be a major source of? Bullshit? -- John R. Carroll
From: Joe788 on 15 May 2010 11:28 On May 15, 8:08 am, "John R. Carroll" <nu...(a)bidness.dev.nul> wrote: > Joe788 wrote: > > On May 14, 6:19 pm, Joe788 <larryro...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> In a nut shell it's because Jon Banquer knows what he's talking about > >> and has spent the time documenting it with specifics... unlike any of > >> the worthless, lying scumbags who have posted in this thread. > > >> Who's going to be the next major source to come out and say how much > >> they appreciate the efforts Jon Banquer makes and that they want his > >> input? > > > Jon, the only person agreeing with you is agreeing with you because > > he's just as clueless as you. > > > Wasn't Synchronous Technology supposed to take over the world already? > > Or was that buzzword already replaced by "Inventor Fusion." > > > LOL! > > Since when are the two that apparently agreed with him a "major source" and > what are they suposed to be a major source of? > Bullshit? > > -- > John R. Carroll Come on John, *everybody* who checks out software demos but doesn't use them in a real working environment is an "expert". Just look at Jon!
From: Cliff on 15 May 2010 12:34 On Sat, 15 May 2010 07:55:42 -0700 (PDT), Joe788 <joemama788(a)aol.com> wrote: >On May 14, 6:19�pm, Joe788 <larryro...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> In a nut shell it's because Jon Banquer knows what he's talking about >> and has spent the time documenting it with specifics... unlike any of >> the worthless, lying scumbags who have posted in this thread. >> >> Who's going to be the next major source to come out and say how much >> they appreciate the efforts Jon Banquer makes and that they want his >> input? > >Jon, the only person agreeing with you is agreeing with you because >he's just as clueless as you. Even admitted he cannot even use SW very well !!! > >Wasn't Synchronous Technology supposed to take over the world already? >Or was that buzzword already replaced by "Inventor Fusion." > >LOL! The buzzwords clueless stole [ http://www.deskeng.com/virtual_desktop/?p=1667 "The words I once stole from VX marketing material to describe what I believed needed to happen were: Seamless, Unified and Hybrid." - yonnie (bunko) bonkers ] -- Cliff
From: Cliff on 15 May 2010 12:36 On Fri, 14 May 2010 18:19:14 -0700 (PDT), Joe788 <larryrozer(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >In a nut shell it's because Jon Banquer knows what he's talking about Like how to use MC to drill holes? Simple stuff like that? CAD/CAM Secrets Revealed http://www.mastercamforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=10 .187 is NOT the same as .1875 or .1865 or .1873!! And when you have two differently sized holes selecting a large one with a + selection tolerance will not find the smaller ones. But if you select a smaller one it may find the larger ones. Naturally these may be selected as multiple sets ... http://www.mastercamforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=14 "Mask on arc" works just fine for the non-clueless. And nobody that does not know simple things such as 1875 > 1873 has any business pretending to be a programmer of any sort. -- Cliff
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Sneak Peak! Next: Leading CAD Publication Editors Start To Agree With Jon Banquer... |