Prev: consensus on how much Missing Mass, NOVA's tv show Chapter 4, Missing Mass #226 Atom Totality
Next: product of hessian matrix and gradient
From: mjc on 20 Jul 2010 10:39 See this paper: "Prime Number Races" by Andrew Granville and Greg Martin in American Mathematical Monthly vol 113 (2006) pages 1-33, url http://www.dms.umontreal.ca/~andrew/PDF/PrimeRace.pdf Among many fascinating results, they prove (actually provide a reference to a proof) "there âusuallyâ seem to be more primes up to x of the form qn + b than of the form qn + a if a is a square modulo q and b is not. Indeed, under our two assumptions (that is, the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis and the linear independence of the relevant γ s), Rubinstein and Sarnak proved that this is true: the logarithmic measure of the set of x for which there are more primes of the form qn + b up to x than of the form qn + a is strictly greater than 1/2, although always less than 1. In other words, any nonsquare is ahead of any square more than half the time, though not 100% of the time." The reference also proves "We can ask the same question when a and b are either both squares modulo q or both nonsquares modulo q. In this case, under the same assumptions, Rubinstein and Sarnak demonstrated that #{primes qn + a ⤠x} > #{primes qn + b ⤠x} exactly half the time." Here is the reference: M. Rubinstein and P. Sarnak, Chebyshevâs bias, Experiment. Math. 3 (1994) 173â197. |