Prev: Stupid Italiian Math
Next: Unhappiness about product rule
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 10 Jul 2010 14:38
There may have been in past times where I elevated the missing mass
(MM) problem
higher than the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) because
mass is more important than a feature of the cosmos of its background
radiation.
But the trouble with MM is that there is no science concensus as to
how much
is missing. When some look at solid body rotation of strange galaxies,
they
come up with a low end estimate of 70% of Cosmic mass is missing,
whereas
on the other end of the spectrum, solid body rotation is seen as 99%
of Cosmic
mass is missing.

Mass is more important than a cosmic feature of background radiation,
but when
the evidence has no science concensus, it is difficult to use the
missing mass as
the most compelling evidence. In the Big Bang theory there never was
any missing
mass prediction. In the Atom Totality theory, there is a spectacular
prediction, for
it predicts that the Cosmic mass, over 99% resides in a Cosmic
Nucleus, and we
cannot directly see it for it lies in a Atom Totality space node of
plutonium.

If there was a concensus, or ever will be a concensus as to how much
of MM is
missing. If the astrophysics community ever agreed that 99% or more of
the Cosmic
mass is missing, then I would rate this evidence as high as the
Blackbody CMBR.
The reason that Blackbody CMBR is the highest evidence to date, is
because it
not only dismisses the Big Bang, for only atoms have blackbody
radiation, but that
the precision required to arrive at blackbody, is a precision very
much lacking in the
spread of missing mass anywhere from 70% to 99%. This inaccuracy of
spread of how
much is missing, keeps me from elevating the Missing Mass as a high
piece of evidence.



Unlike the earlier editions of this book, I need
to try to relate the Cosmic features of mass, temperature and shape.
This is something the Big Bang theory could never embark upon, nor
any
other fake theory.


So we all have a view and understanding of an atom
of plutonium. We know its dot-cloud-pattern of the
electrons of the 5f6 of plutonium are dodecahedron
in shape. We know from Double-Slit where the Nucleus
would be the double-slit that we have patterns of
dense dots as great walls or clusters of galaxies interspersed by
voids. And so far so good since that is
exactly what we see in the distribution of galaxies.
And the temperature as blackbody microwave at 2.71K
is also confirming a Plutonium Atom Totality. And the
Schrodinger Wave Equation gives a nonrelativistic 6-sided and a
relativistic dodecahedron shape for the 5f6
of plutonium.


So can I put all those three together. I think I can because they fit
as consistency.  If any one of them
were different, then the three would be inconsistent. So
the argument is of consistency.


I think my best proof that the Universe is a plutonium atom is the
blackbody CMBR and then the distribution of galaxies as that of a
band of
walls or superclusters then a band of voids. So we have this
alternating pattern of walls of galaxies then
voids. This is an impossible pattern for a Big Bang explosion.


But I need to try to join the temperature with dodecahedron shape to
that of the mass distribution of
alternating walls with voids. I need to begin to join evidences so
that the
consistency of the evidences makes for the inescapable conclusion of
an Atom Totality.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Stupid Italiian Math
Next: Unhappiness about product rule