Prev: Simple and direct proof that the theoretical science of AGW isfraud and the product of the host of charlatans led by J Hansen
Next: * Iarnbored Hates US * the proven usenet kook makes HUGE stinking turd pile in newsgroups by hating peace and worshipping war criminals AWOL and Cheney
From: habshi on 22 May 2010 17:29
It must be something to do with the quarks inside each atom of
matter and antimatter. But then what is it about quark and antiquark
that cause them to destroy each other?
Another mystery is why should gravity tail off as a square of the
distance? Why not 0.83 of the square? Maybe there is a God doing all
this herself?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark
Hadrons, along with the valence quarks (qv) that contribute to
their quantum numbers, contain virtual quark�antiquark (qq) pairs
known as sea quarks (qs). Sea quarks form when a gluon of the hadron's
color field splits; this process also works in reverse in that the
annihilation of two sea quarks produces a gluon
Quarks are the only elementary particles in the Standard Model of
particle physics to experience all four fundamental interactions, also
known as fundamental forces (electromagnetism, gravitation, strong
interaction, and weak interaction), as well as the only known
particles whose electric charges are not integer multiples of the
elementary charge

Antiparticles of quarks are called antiquarks, and are denoted by a
bar over the symbol for the corresponding quark, such as u for an up
antiquark. As with antimatter in general, antiquarks have the same
mass, mean lifetime, and spin as their respective quarks, but the
electric charge and other charges have the opposite sign.[9]
The charm quarks were observed bound with charm antiquarks in
mesons. The two parties had assigned the discovered meson two
different symbols, J and ?; thus, it became formally known as the J/?
meson
Every quark carries a color, while every antiquark carries an
anticolor.Above a certain energy threshold, pairs of quarks and
antiquarks are created.

bbc.co.uk
Similar processes occurring at the beginning of the Universe
should have left us with equal amounts of matter and anti-matter.

Yet, paradoxically, today we live in a Universe made up overwhelmingly
of matter.

Unexplained result

Researchers working on the DZero experiment observed collisions of
protons and anti-protons in Fermilab's Tevatron particle accelerator.

They found that these collisions produced pairs of matter particles
slightly more often than they yielded anti-matter particles.

The results show a 1% difference in the production of pairs of muon
(matter) particles and pairs of anti-muons (anti-matter particles) in
these high-energy collisions.

"Many of us felt goose bumps when we saw the result," said Stefan
Soldner-Rembold, one of the spokespeople for DZero.

"We knew we were seeing something beyond what we have seen before and
beyond what current theories can explain."

The dominance of matter in the Universe is possible only if there are
differences in the behaviour of particles and anti-particles

From: bert on 22 May 2010 18:08
On May 22, 5:29 pm, hab...(a)anony.net wrote:
>   It must be something to do with the quarks inside each atom of
> matter and antimatter. But then what is it about quark and antiquark
> that cause them to destroy each other?
>    Another mystery is why should gravity tail off as a square of the
> distance? Why not 0.83 of the square? Maybe there is a God doing all
> this herself?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark
>         Hadrons, along with the valence quarks (qv) that contribute to
> their quantum numbers, contain virtual quark–antiquark (qq) pairs
> known as sea quarks (qs). Sea quarks form when a gluon of the hadron's
> color field splits; this process also works in reverse in that the
> annihilation of two sea quarks produces a gluon
> Quarks are the only elementary particles in the Standard Model of
> particle physics to experience all four fundamental interactions, also
> known as fundamental forces (electromagnetism, gravitation, strong
> interaction, and weak interaction), as well as the only known
> particles whose electric charges are not integer multiples of the
> elementary charge
>
>  Antiparticles of quarks are called antiquarks, and are denoted by a
> bar over the symbol for the corresponding quark, such as u for an up
> antiquark. As with antimatter in general, antiquarks have the same
> mass, mean lifetime, and spin as their respective quarks, but the
> electric charge and other charges have the opposite sign.[9]
>         The charm quarks were observed bound with charm antiquarks in
> mesons. The two parties had assigned the discovered meson two
> different symbols, J and ?; thus, it became formally known as the J/?
> meson
>         Every quark carries a color, while every antiquark carries an
> anticolor.Above a certain energy threshold, pairs of quarks and
> antiquarks are created.
>
> bbc.co.uk
>         Similar processes occurring at the beginning of the Universe
> should have left us with equal amounts of matter and anti-matter.
>
> Yet, paradoxically, today we live in a Universe made up overwhelmingly
> of matter.
>
> Unexplained result
>
> Researchers working on the DZero experiment observed collisions of
> protons and anti-protons in Fermilab's Tevatron particle accelerator.
>
> They found that these collisions produced pairs of matter particles
> slightly more often than they yielded anti-matter particles.
>
> The results show a 1% difference in the production of pairs of muon
> (matter) particles and pairs of anti-muons (anti-matter particles) in
> these high-energy collisions.
>
> "Many of us felt goose bumps when we saw the result," said Stefan
> Soldner-Rembold, one of the spokespeople for DZero.
>
> "We knew we were seeing something beyond what we have seen before and
> beyond what current theories can explain."
>
> The dominance of matter in the Universe is possible only if there are
> differences in the behaviour of particles and anti-particles

Different plane ,Opposite spin and charge TreBert
From: 7 on 22 May 2010 19:29
habshi(a)anony.net wrote:

> It must be something to do with the quarks inside each atom of
> matter and antimatter. But then what is it about quark and antiquark
> that cause them to destroy each other?


If you can define the word 'destroy' I'll give you a medal.

To truly destroy something, you would have to undefine it completely
and in a secure way that leaves nothing behind.

And therein lies the problem.

First you have to destroy all the electric properties.
Then you have to destroy all the magnetic properties.
Then you have to destroy the spin.
Then you have to destroy x
They you have to destroy y etc... until all properties are destroyed.
And then make sure nothing is left behind.
And the machinery for making that happen has to itself be
defined with great precision to make it work perfectly.

And miraculously, you have to redefine all these if you intend to create
matter and anti-matter from gamma rays.

Why not make it a lot more simpler by saying that when something annhiliates
and gives off energy (e.g. electron positron annhiliation gives off two
gamma rays of 500 MeV), and binds together so tightly that nothing
else can interact with them.

Typically atoms interact and release energy of the order of 1eV
and size of resulting structures are about 10,000 times smaller
that that wavelength. So if 500 MeV was released the size of the resulting
compound is 10^-9 smaller than an atom at the very least and possibly
10^-13 meters in size. It would be like a gas so fine and neutral
it would pass through atoms.



> Another mystery is why should gravity tail off as a square of the
> distance? Why not 0.83 of the square? Maybe there is a God doing all
> this herself?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark
> Hadrons, along with the valence quarks (qv) that contribute to
> their quantum numbers, contain virtual quark�antiquark (qq) pairs
> known as sea quarks (qs). Sea quarks form when a gluon of the hadron's
> color field splits; this process also works in reverse in that the
> annihilation of two sea quarks produces a gluon
> Quarks are the only elementary particles in the Standard Model of
> particle physics to experience all four fundamental interactions, also
> known as fundamental forces (electromagnetism, gravitation, strong
> interaction, and weak interaction), as well as the only known
> particles whose electric charges are not integer multiples of the
> elementary charge
>
> Antiparticles of quarks are called antiquarks, and are denoted by a
> bar over the symbol for the corresponding quark, such as u for an up
> antiquark. As with antimatter in general, antiquarks have the same
> mass, mean lifetime, and spin as their respective quarks, but the
> electric charge and other charges have the opposite sign.[9]
> The charm quarks were observed bound with charm antiquarks in
> mesons. The two parties had assigned the discovered meson two
> different symbols, J and ?; thus, it became formally known as the J/?
> meson
> Every quark carries a color, while every antiquark carries an
> anticolor.Above a certain energy threshold, pairs of quarks and
> antiquarks are created.
>
> bbc.co.uk
> Similar processes occurring at the beginning of the Universe
> should have left us with equal amounts of matter and anti-matter.
>
> Yet, paradoxically, today we live in a Universe made up overwhelmingly
> of matter.
>
> Unexplained result
>
> Researchers working on the DZero experiment observed collisions of
> protons and anti-protons in Fermilab's Tevatron particle accelerator.
>
> They found that these collisions produced pairs of matter particles
> slightly more often than they yielded anti-matter particles.
>
> The results show a 1% difference in the production of pairs of muon
> (matter) particles and pairs of anti-muons (anti-matter particles) in
> these high-energy collisions.
>
> "Many of us felt goose bumps when we saw the result," said Stefan
> Soldner-Rembold, one of the spokespeople for DZero.
>
> "We knew we were seeing something beyond what we have seen before and
> beyond what current theories can explain."
>
> The dominance of matter in the Universe is possible only if there are
> differences in the behaviour of particles and anti-particles


 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Simple and direct proof that the theoretical science of AGW isfraud and the product of the host of charlatans led by J Hansen
Next: * Iarnbored Hates US * the proven usenet kook makes HUGE stinking turd pile in newsgroups by hating peace and worshipping war criminals AWOL and Cheney