Prev: Re (2): output from udevadm
Next: thinking of installing amd64 Debian: what is its current state?
From: Tom H on 13 Jul 2010 01:30 On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:37 AM, H.S. <hs.samix(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/07/10 03:07 PM, H.S. wrote: >> >> Curiously though, update-grub is now detecting Fedora 13! It was not > > Well, I wrote that too soon. > > Here is what update-grub puts in /boot/grub > /grub.cfg regarding the Fedora 13 installation: > ####################################################### > menuentry "Fedora release 13 (Goddard) (on /dev/mapper/vg1-lv8)" { > insmod part_msdos > insmod ext2 > set root='(hd0,msdos5)' > search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set > b40b5b7f-6999-4a12-9d3b-62e0fc892a40 > linux /vmlinuz-2.6.33.6-147.fc13.x86_64 root=/dev/dm-1 > } > ####################################################### > > It is missing the initrd line. Without that line the kernel does not > boot and panics and halts. > > I have to put the correct stanza myself in /etc/grub.d/40_custom to get > the correct grub entry which works: > ####################################################### > menuentry "Fedora release 13 (on /dev/mapper/vg1-lv8)" { > insmod part_msdos > insmod ext4 > set root='(hd0,msdos5)' > search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set > b40b5b7f-6999-4a12-9d3b-62e0fc892a40 > linux /vmlinuz-2.6.33.6-147.fc13.x86_64 root=/dev/mapper/vg1-lv8 > ro quiet > initrd /initramfs-2.6.33.6-147.fc13.x86_64.img > boot > } > ####################################################### > > So there still appears to be some problem somewhere. Yes. The Fedora/RHEL initrd names are not recognized by Debian/Ubuntu's grub... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTilIljkgvh8aCuh661HBwVrbof-ZhJqaiRRfTMQM(a)mail.gmail.com
From: Tom H on 13 Jul 2010 02:00 On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:45 AM, H.S. <hs.samix(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 13/07/10 01:28 AM, Tom H wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:37 AM, H.S. <hs.samix(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> It is missing the initrd line. Without that line the kernel does not >>> boot and panics and halts. >>> >>> I have to put the correct stanza myself in /etc/grub.d/40_custom to get >>> the correct grub entry which works: > <SNIP> >>> >>> So there still appears to be some problem somewhere. >> >> Yes. The Fedora/RHEL initrd names are not recognized by Debian/Ubuntu's grub... > > > I see. Could you briefly explain why is that? Quite frankly, I thought that this had been fixed (I read it on either the Debian or Ubuntu bug reporting system), but I came across this problem last year and the script was looking for initrds of the form "initrd.img-..." and therefore ignored "initramfs..." files. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTikBOmhjq6HZCY5B-_g4EJlsss4QE8fT8iFsgg9u(a)mail.gmail.com
From: Tom H on 13 Jul 2010 02:20 On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Sven Joachim <svenjoac(a)gmx.de> wrote: > On 2010-07-13 07:45 +0200, H.S. wrote: > >> On 13/07/10 01:28 AM, Tom H wrote: >>> >>> Yes. The Fedora/RHEL initrd names are not recognized by Debian/Ubuntu's grub... > > It should work in os-prober 1.39. Thanks for the info. As I said in a previous email, I thought that it had been fixed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTilMwpN8oqYGCq5-UJqveTtn38HsyYgNNGLPkKA8(a)mail.gmail.com
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Re (2): output from udevadm Next: thinking of installing amd64 Debian: what is its current state? |