Prev: Why html5/proprietary H.264 will fail (was) Scribd "scrapping Flash and betting the company on HTML5"
Next: Opera joins in Jobs v Flash argument
From: George Kerby on 6 May 2010 10:49



On 5/5/10 11:56 PM, in article 060520100056581133%nospam(a)nospam.invalid,
"nospam" <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote:

> In article <Xns9D7075556D2Fnoonehomecom(a)74.209.131.13>, Larry
> <noone(a)home.com> wrote:
>
>> What's to question?
>
> your intelligence.

Mutually exclusive words.

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Why html5/proprietary H.264 will fail (was) Scribd "scrapping Flash and betting the company on HTML5"
Next: Opera joins in Jobs v Flash argument