From: Ulick Magee on 26 Jul 2010 13:54 Cecil Westerhof wrote: > On both 11.2 and 11.3 a complete update system has a 3.6.6 Firefox. > Yesterday I had to work on a Windows system and this has 3.6.8. Why is > openSuse lagging behind? Happens all the time with Firefox and Opera. IIRC the 10.60 Opera was available for a week before openSUSE put it on their update repos. I would only worry if there was a MAJOR security issue that was exploitable in the real world, and there wasn't a workaround to mitigate it. In that case I'd use another package until the update was available. But it's very rare for a browser issue on linux to be that serious, and to have no workaround (e.g. disabling javascript except on known trusted sites - which I always do, anyway.) openSUSE test the new versions before pushing them out. If they just took every update and patch from upstream and pushed them out ASAP with no testing, sooner or later something would break. If you want to run that risk, then by all means use the Mozilla (etc.) repos, or Factory, to get the latest stuff. Also it's openSUSE policy not to do version upgrades except in rare cases. E.g. Firefox on 11.1 is at 3.5.10, it will not be moving to 3.6.x, but openSUSE will backport security fixes to 3.5 if required. Sometimes the old version of a package is too old or bug ridden or too difficult to backport the fixes to, so they will force a version upgrade, but this is rare enough. Kernels are the same, the 11.1 kernel is 2.6.27.x and will stay on that version for its whole lifetime, but important fixes will be backported. If you really really want the latest, you can get it and install it yourself, but most users will not want to or need to, and those that do will be aware that it can cause problems. The whole point of a linux distribution is that code is tested before release, not just that it works but that it doesn't break other things, and is all compiled on the same gcc version. The approach of updating everything individually and hoping it just works is the Windows approach and leads to DLL hell. It's almost as bad in OSX, all non-Apple software has to be updated manually by the user. -- Ulick Magee Free software and free formats for free information for free people. Open Office for Windows/OSX/Linux: http://www.openoffice.org openSUSE Linux: http://en.opensuse.org
From: mjt on 26 Jul 2010 15:23 On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:26:55 +0200 Cecil Westerhof <Cecil(a)decebal.nl> wrote: > On both 11.2 and 11.3 a complete update system has a 3.6.6 Firefox. > Yesterday I had to work on a Windows system and this has 3.6.8. Why is > openSuse lagging behind? I have FF 3.6.8 and 4.0beta2 installed here - openSUSE 11.3 x86_64, so for me, openSUSE isn't "lagging behind". Not sure what your issue might be. -- Please try to limit the amount of "this room doesn't have any bazingas" until you are told that those rooms are "punched out". Once punched out, we have a right to complain about atrocities, missing bazingas, and such. - N. Meyrowitz <<< Remove YOURSHOES to email me >>>
From: Cecil Westerhof on 27 Jul 2010 00:28 Op maandag 26 jul 2010 19:46 CEST schreef Hendrik van Hees: > I always use yast, not zypper. I use both. > There you can click repositories. Then chose > the obs mozilla repository and click "switch system packages to the versions > in this repository". I am afraid I am missing something. I do not see how to do that. How is this done? The strange thing is that on 11.2 and 11.3 there has been several updates. They did not come with 3.6.6. I am sure about that, because it is from 26 June. I did put the priority from Mozilla and Packman to 20, but that did not have an effect. -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
From: Cecil Westerhof on 27 Jul 2010 00:56 Op maandag 26 jul 2010 19:46 CEST schreef Hendrik van Hees: > I always use yast, not zypper. There you can click repositories. Then chose > the obs mozilla repository and click "switch system packages to the versions > in this repository". It keeps getting stranger. On another 11.2 system 3.6.7 was already installed. When updating with yast 3.6.8 was not installed, when updating with zypper it was installed. When searching in Software Management with Firefox in my not updated system I get: │Name │Summary │Avail. Vers.│Inst. Vers.│S│ i │MozillaFirefox │Mozilla Firefox Web Browser │3.6.6 │3.6.6 │ │ │MozillaFirefox-branding-Moblin │Moblin branding of MozillaFirefox │3.5 │ │ │ i │MozillaFirefox-branding-openSUSE │openSUSE branding of MozillaFirefox │3.5 │3.5 │ │ │MozillaFirefox-branding-upstream │Upstream branding for MozillaFirefox │3.6.8 │ │ │ │MozillaFirefox-debuginfo │Debug information for package MozillaFirefox │3.6.8 │ │ │ │MozillaFirefox-debugsource │Debug sources for package MozillaFirefox │3.6.8 │ │ │ i │MozillaFirefox-theme-oxygen │Oxygen for Mozilla Firefox │1.4.92 │1.4.92 │ │ i │MozillaFirefox-translations-common│Common translations for MozillaFirefox │3.6.6 │3.6.6 │ │ │MozillaFirefox-translations-other │Extra translations for MozillaFirefox │3.6.8 │ │ │ │beagle-firefox │Firefox Plugin for the Desktop search application beagle│0.3.9 │ │ │ │mhtml-firefox │Provides Firefox with MHTML web archive compatibility │0.5 │ On the system with Firefox 3.6.8 MozillaFirefox and MozillaFirefox-translations-common are 3.6.8 and on this system 3.6.6. The strange thing is that MozillaFirefox-translations-other is 3.6.8. If anybody understands what is happening here ... -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
From: David Bolt on 27 Jul 2010 04:49 On Tuesday 27 Jul 2010 09:04, while playing with a tin of spray paint, houghi painted this mural: > David Bolt wrote: >> I've had that too, and it can be damn annoying. Almost as annoying as >> trying to get it to open when it's been using a live CD and I'm trying >> to get the disc out before it shuts down. > > I just let it reboot, go through the 'boot from HD' process and then go > on. I have noticed lately (but that can be imaginary, as I don't pay > much attention during the install) that it does a soft-reboot, so does > not go past the BIOS, but directly into the booting process. You're not imagining it. It uses kexec to swap kernels and reboot faster. A quick Google shows this: <http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=785347> which I think I'll try out to see if I can use it for faster reboots :) >> Always have to turn it on again before it lets me have it back. I'm >> sure it's just after being turned on again and again :) > > Maurice Moss, is that you? Oh dear... Regards, David Bolt -- Team Acorn: www.distributed.net | | openSUSE 11.3RC2 32b | openSUSE 11.1 64b | openSUSE 11.2 64b | | openSUSE 11.1 PPC | TOS 4.02 | RISC OS 4.02 | RISC OS 3.11
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Changing the CPU speed as user Next: odd results using tar to do a full system backup .... |