From: RandomUser on 12 Dec 2009 04:13 If I have FF-3.5 compatible audio/video plugins available, why would I want or need Pulseaudio (or any other "sound server") to be required and installed by Firefox-3.5?
From: Balwinder S Dheeman on 12 Dec 2009 07:09 On 12/12/2009 02:43 PM, RandomUser wrote: > If I have FF-3.5 compatible audio/video plugins available, why would I > want or need Pulseaudio (or any other "sound server") to be required and > installed by Firefox-3.5? Just, because the maintainer and, or users of the port did not find time to figure out what might be a right choice in case of FreeBSD ;) -- Balwinder S "bdheeman" Dheeman Registered Linux User: #229709 Anu'z Linux(a)HOME (Unix Shoppe) Machines: #168573, 170593, 259192 Chandigarh, UT, 160062, India Plan9, T2, Arch/Debian/FreeBSD/XP Home: http://werc.homelinux.net/ Visit: http://counter.li.org/
From: Warren Block on 12 Dec 2009 17:46 RandomUser <rannumgen(a)globaleyes.net> wrote: > If I have FF-3.5 compatible audio/video plugins available, why would I > want or need Pulseaudio (or any other "sound server") to be required and > installed by Firefox-3.5? Firefox 3.6 (www/firefox3-devel), you mean? The Makefile says pulseaudio is only needed if you have a version of FreeBSD before 7.0. -- Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota * USA
From: RandomUser on 23 Dec 2009 05:09 Warren Block wrote: > RandomUser <rannumgen(a)globaleyes.net> wrote: >> If I have FF-3.5 compatible audio/video plugins available, why would I >> want or need Pulseaudio (or any other "sound server") to be required and >> installed by Firefox-3.5? > > Firefox 3.6 (www/firefox3-devel), you mean? The Makefile says > pulseaudio is only needed if you have a version of FreeBSD before 7.0. I am not concerned about the choices made for different versions of FBSD. What I want is to remove the requirement for an application for which I have no use and which eats up a lot of resources. What is that FBSD motto about not introducing changes that break existing applications? In my mind, forcing pulseaudio as a requirement breaks that motto. It should be an option instead. That brings me back to my original question: why does Firefox need a sound server - why pulseaudio (or libsydney_oss)? If FBSD has the ability to "play audio" via plugins or other standalone applications, why is a "sound server" required? Note: "required" not "desired". ls -l /usr/ports/INDEX-7 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 21618682 Dec 22 19:26 /usr/ports/INDEX-7 grep pulseaudio INDEX-7 | awk -F\| '{print $1}' | sort accerciser-1.8.0 akode-plugins-pulseaudio-2.0.2_2 alacarte-0.12.4 arista-0.9.3 compiz-0.8.4 compiz-fusion-0.8.4 compiz-plugins-extra-0.8.4 compiz-plugins-main-0.8.4 compiz-plugins-unsupported-0.8.4 compizconfig-backend-gconf-0.8.4 compizconfig-python-0.8.4 deskbar-applet-2.28.0 drivel-2.0.2_10 emerald-0.8.4 fldigi-3.11_3 gdm-2.28.2 gimmie-0.2.7_4 glipper-1.0_3 gmerlin-0.4.1_1 gmerlin-avdecoder-1.0.1_1 gnome-applets-2.28.0_1 gnome-art-0.2_4 gnome-control-center-2.28.1_1 gnome-games-2.28.2 gnome-games-extra-data-2.28.0 gnome-media-2.28.1_1 gnome-session-2.28.0 gnome-settings-daemon-2.28.1_2 gnome-splashscreen-manager-0.2_8 gnome2-2.28.2 gnome2-fifth-toe-2.28.2_1 gnome2-hacker-tools-2.28.2 gnome2-lite-2.28.2_1 gnome2-power-tools-2.28.2 gnomesudoku-0.6.0_2 gstreamer-plugins-all-1.3.0.10.1_6 gstreamer-plugins-pulse-0.10.17,3 hamster-applet-2.28.2 libcompizconfig-0.8.4 moonlight-1.0.1_4 ontv-2.4.0_7 openmovieeditor-0.0.20090105 orca-2.28.2 padevchooser-0.9.3_2 paman-0.9.4_1 pavucontrol-0.9.7_1 pavumeter-0.9.3_2 pessulus-2.28.0 pidgin-rhythmbox-2.0_3 pulseaudio-0.9.21 py26-gnome-desktop-2.28.0 py26-pychess-0.8.2_2 rbscrobbler-0.0.9_5 revelation-0.4.11_6 rhythmbox-0.12.6_1 scribes-0.3.3.3_3 serpentine-0.7_5 service-discovery-applet-0.4.3_9 sound-juicer-2.28.1_1 timer-applet-2.1.2_1 totem-2.28.5 totem-xine-2.28.5_5 tracker-gnome-0.6.95_1 wine-doors-0.1.2_3 ls -l /usr/ports/www/firefox35/Makefile -rw-rw-r-- 1 root wheel 4058 Dec 16 20:07 Makefile more /usr/ports/www/firefox35/Makefile .. .. .. ..if ${OSVERSION} < 700000 LIB_DEPENDS+= pulse.0:${PORTSDIR}/audio/pulseaudio EXTRA_PATCHES= ${FILESDIR}/releng6_pulseaudio ..else EXTRA_PATCHES= ${FILESDIR}/libsydney_oss ..endif .. .. ..
From: Warren Block on 23 Dec 2009 14:52 RandomUser <rannumgen(a)globaleyes.net> wrote: > Warren Block wrote: >> RandomUser <rannumgen(a)globaleyes.net> wrote: >>> If I have FF-3.5 compatible audio/video plugins available, why would I >>> want or need Pulseaudio (or any other "sound server") to be required and >>> installed by Firefox-3.5? >> >> Firefox 3.6 (www/firefox3-devel), you mean? The Makefile says >> pulseaudio is only needed if you have a version of FreeBSD before 7.0. > > I am not concerned about the choices made for different versions of > FBSD. What I want is to remove the requirement for an application for > which I have no use and which eats up a lot of resources. It appears that the later versions of Firefox need (or at least want) sound server capabilities. On FreeBSD 8, firefox3 (or -devel) wants esound. > What is that FBSD motto about not introducing changes that break > existing applications? Which motto? "POLA" would imply sound works in Firefox, and the port does that. Which existing application broke? > In my mind, forcing pulseaudio as a requirement breaks that motto. It > should be an option instead. That may require additional coding which no one has done yet ("Patches welcome[TM]"). > That brings me back to my original question: why does Firefox need a > sound server - why pulseaudio (or libsydney_oss)? The freebsd-gecko mailing list would be a good place to ask, or developer.mozilla.org. -- Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota * USA
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: FreeBSD 8 and Winbind via pam_krb5 Next: Trying to verify the isos via md5 |