Why is the square of the universal speed limit the amount of energy?
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Quantum Gravity 368.1: x = [1 +/- sqrt(3) i ]/2 as a Lagrangean Analog and i as a Phase Indicator
Next: GRAVITY GRAVITY GRAVITY GRAVITY Re: POOR STEPHEN HAWKING SHORT OF COMMON SENSE
From: calvin on 2 May 2010 12:39 On May 2, 12:30 pm, calvin <cri...(a)windstream.net> wrote: > Units matter, and if you're going to express c as meters[/sec], > then you need to adjust the other units accordingly. Make indicated insertion to correct typo.
From: cjcountess on 2 May 2010 12:53 I posted the answer to this in 2005, http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/ca039401923f2ad3/dba44e7b59fb89d2?hl=en&q=cjcountess http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thread/858a3e05fbefd8fa/9717bdd714e8e6d?hl=en&q=cjcountess http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/be9e76ef7b2d4e0/e795452f3fbe840b?hl=en&q=cjcountess just in time for the "100th aniversery, of this most famouse equaton in the world, (E=mc^2), by the most famouse scientist, "Albert Einstien". The answer is the most simplest, yet most profound and is that, (E=mc^2) = (E=mc^circled), and/or sphered, and (c=sqrt-1), because c^2, is c in liniear direction, x c in 90 degree angular direction, creating a 90 degree angular, counterclockwise rotation, which if constant creates a circle, of energy of momentum "h/2pi", or standing spherical wave, of momentum "h/2pi/2", "spin 1/2" and "-1 charge", as well as gravitational rest mass = "G" because (c^2 = v^2 = G) as the ultamite (L/T^2). You all can go from website to website, trying to get a different answer, but no one can get around it, because it is the simplest, yet most profound truth. Conrad J Countess
From: cjcountess on 2 May 2010 12:56 One of the first questions I ask myself and others, including professors and scientist, is, "if the speed of light is constant, and the highest possible speed, than how can it be squared to create matter"? No one could give me a satisfacory answer, but through the power of analogy and reason, I found one. Analogous to, "a line of 1 inch in the linear direction, x a line of 1 inch in the 90 degree angular direction, to create 1 square inch", I reasoned that ",c" in the linear direction, x "c" in the 90 degree angular direction, must = "c^2", and creates matter. This analogy, coupled with the fact that, photon "energy/mass", is measured (E=hf/ c^2) that the higher the energy, mass, and momentum, the shorter the wavelength, and more "particle like", the wave becomes, I reasoned that, at some point on the EM spetrum, "E must = hf = c^2" or, as debroglie stated, (E=hf=mc^2) and that (mc^2), (Ec^2), or just (c^2), is a frequency/wavelength, where energy equals, and turns to matter. As it turns out E=mc^2 could represent F=mv^2 and point on EM spectrum where energy equals and turns to matter because it take on a spherical and or circlear motion due to c^2 being c in liniear direction x c in 90 degree angular direction creating c in circular and or spherical rotation due to a balence of centripital and centrifugal forces measured as F=mv^2/r or E=mc^2/r Conrad J Countess
From: BURT on 2 May 2010 14:40 On May 2, 9:56 am, cjcountess <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > One of the first questions I ask myself and others, including > professors and scientist, is, "if the speed of light is constant, and > the highest possible speed, than how can it be squared to create > matter"? > > No one could give me a satisfacory answer, but through the power of > analogy and reason, I found one. > > Analogous to, "a line of 1 inch in the linear direction, x a line of 1 > inch in the 90 degree angular direction, to create 1 square inch", I > reasoned that ",c" in the linear direction, x "c" in the 90 degree > angular direction, must = "c^2", and creates matter. This analogy, > coupled with the fact that, photon "energy/mass", is measured (E=hf/ > c^2) that the higher the energy, mass, and momentum, the shorter the > wavelength, and more "particle like", the wave becomes, I reasoned > that, at some point on the EM spetrum, "E must = hf = c^2" or, as > debroglie stated, (E=hf=mc^2) and that (mc^2), (Ec^2), or just (c^2), > is a frequency/wavelength, where energy equals, and turns to matter. > > As it turns out E=mc^2 could represent F=mv^2 and point on EM spectrum > where energy equals and turns to matter because it take on a spherical > and or circlear motion due to c^2 being c in liniear direction x c in > 90 degree angular direction creating c in circular and or spherical > rotation due to a balence of centripital and centrifugal forces > measured as F=mv^2/r or E=mc^2/r > > Conrad J Countess Why does the fundamental energy come from the speed limit of the universe squared? It is the best question. Mitch Raemsch
From: cjcountess on 2 May 2010 17:19
"c", is the natural speed of raw electromagnetic energy, which takes the natural form of traveling in a relativly straight, or wavey line, at constant speed. The speed limit of "c", acts as a wall of resistence, which prevents this raw energy from going any faster in this liniear direction. Increases in energy is deflected off of this wall of resistence, displacing itself, in the angular direction, which creates waves. The more energy - the shorter thw waves. Energy in its ground stated, at lowest level, moves in relatively straight line, at constant speed of "c", and as such, is in a sense, standing still, or not accellerating. And so "h" Planck's constant, which is the "energy of the constant speed of light, in a straight line", is also euvalent to "the constant mass of the photon", and as such, is like its rest mass, if moving at constant speed, in straight line, is equivalent to being still. Thus (c=h) = "The rest frame of the Universe", and might be called "the Aether, Higgs field, Background Dark Energy, zero point energy field or Cosmological Constant, or what ever one choses to call it. To me they are all the same, generaly, and I will not argue over the details seperating each, unless they are of quantum leap importance. Still the constant speed of light "c" with its constant mass/energy of "h", is the very foundation and central sun, around which all waves and particles ocsilate, analogouse to orbiting. Thus the equation E=hf/c^2 is analogouse to F=Mm/r^2 with, (E = F), (h = M) and (c^2 = r^2) for these equations. Isn't it interesting, that from this perspective, "c", which appears as the fastest speed in the Universe, is actualy the slowest, and "Rest Mass", which appears as the slowest, is actualy the fastest, as indeed "c^2", is faster than "c", and "Rest Mass" is revealed to be "relative mass", in circular and or sperical rotation. We are all moving faster than, "The Speed oflight" Enjoy the Ride Conrad J Countess |