Prev: Bad Sectors
Next: Recommendations for 1 TB drive?
From: Yousuf Khan on 21 Jan 2010 14:22 Mike Tomlinson wrote: > In article <4b572f95$1(a)news.bnb-lp.com>, Yousuf Khan > <bbbl67(a)spammenot.yahoo.com> writes > >> What would the explanation for this be? >> >>> [ Maxtor 6L300R0 (L61F02TH) ] > ^^^^^^ > > That. <spit> Well, the drive has been in continuous use since January 2007, so it's not like as if it's a paragon of unreliability. It's probably due by now. Yousuf Khan
From: Arno on 21 Jan 2010 17:58
Yousuf Khan <bbbl67(a)spammenot.yahoo.com> wrote: > Mike Tomlinson wrote: >> In article <4b572f95$1(a)news.bnb-lp.com>, Yousuf Khan >> <bbbl67(a)spammenot.yahoo.com> writes >> >>> What would the explanation for this be? >>> >>>> [ Maxtor 6L300R0 (L61F02TH) ] >> ^^^^^^ >> >> That. <spit> > Well, the drive has been in continuous use since January 2007, so it's > not like as if it's a paragon of unreliability. It's probably due by now. The old 120/200GB Maxtors were prettu good, except when inadequately cooled. Then they died very fast. But I had something 40 running for 3 years with one failure that could not be explained by other causes (some were mechanically damaged). This did however result in frequent failures in badly cooled PCs and the Maxtor USB drives of that time also had bad cooling. This drive would have benefitted from an "expert use only" sticker. Arno -- Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., CISSP -- Email: arno(a)wagner.name GnuPG: ID: 1E25338F FP: 0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C 0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F ---- Cuddly UI's are the manifestation of wishful thinking. -- Dylan Evans |