From: usenet on 14 Jul 2010 00:55 I'll just come out and say it - for a language that was designed for as much for embedded applications as for anything, it seems to be maddeningly difficult to actually get Ada on a modest embedded platform. By modest I mean low-end 32 bits, no MMU. ARM7 or Cortex Mx would be my first choice. I can be up and running on such a platform with C and a tasking library in a day (Rowley Crossworks, nice package). Why can't I do the same with Ada? Or rather, to avoid making this about me, why can't an embedded programmer - student, hobbyist or professional - who's heard about Ada and wants to give it a spin, including hard-realtime concurrency, just do it? If Ada fans (I include myself) want to see Ada get more exposure, this seems like not only a desirable step but a necessary one. I can run C on a thousand such boards, and I can't (AFAIK) run Ada on one. Maybe this is all available, and I just haven't found out where. Then that's a problem too, but I'll be happy to hear about it. All comments welcome.
From: Jeffrey R. Carter on 14 Jul 2010 01:33 On 07/13/2010 09:55 PM, usenet(a)scriptoriumdesigns.com wrote: > > If Ada fans (I include myself) want to see Ada get more exposure, this > seems like not only a desirable step but a necessary one. I can run C > on a thousand such boards, and I can't (AFAIK) run Ada on one. I can get Ada on all of them: Sofcheck's Ada compiler that produces ANSI C as its intermediate language. http://sofcheck.com/products/adamagic.html -- Jeff Carter "When Roman engineers built a bridge, they had to stand under it while the first legion marched across. If programmers today worked under similar ground rules, they might well find themselves getting much more interested in Ada!" Robert Dewar 62
From: usenet on 14 Jul 2010 02:27 On Jul 13, 10:33 pm, "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter....(a)spam.acm.org> wrote: > On 07/13/2010 09:55 PM, use...(a)scriptoriumdesigns.com wrote: > > > > > If Ada fans (I include myself) want to see Ada get more exposure, this > > seems like not only a desirable step but a necessary one. I can run C > > on a thousand such boards, and I can't (AFAIK) run Ada on one. > > I can get Ada on all of them: Sofcheck's Ada compiler that produces ANSI C as > its intermediate language. > > http://sofcheck.com/products/adamagic.html > Yes, AdaMagic is on my definitely-check-out list, but does it actually address the audience I'm talking about? Can a personal copy be had for e.g. the $150 I spent on the Rowley tools? And even that's pushing it for students and hobbyists. And what about concurrency? How does AdaMagic provide for that? I don't see anything on their website that addresses that question.
From: Dmitry A. Kazakov on 14 Jul 2010 03:23 On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:55:45 -0700 (PDT), usenet(a)scriptoriumdesigns.com wrote: > I'll just come out and say it - for a language that was designed for > as much for embedded applications as for anything, it seems to be > maddeningly difficult to actually get Ada on a modest embedded > platform. By modest I mean low-end 32 bits, no MMU. ARM7 or Cortex > Mx would be my first choice. I can be up and running on such a > platform with C and a tasking library in a day (Rowley Crossworks, > nice package). Why can't I do the same with Ada? Or rather, to avoid > making this about me, why can't an embedded programmer - student, > hobbyist or professional - who's heard about Ada and wants to give it > a spin, including hard-realtime concurrency, just do it? > > If Ada fans (I include myself) want to see Ada get more exposure, this > seems like not only a desirable step but a necessary one. I can run C > on a thousand such boards, and I can't (AFAIK) run Ada on one. > > Maybe this is all available, and I just haven't found out where. Then > that's a problem too, but I'll be happy to hear about it. Board vendors do not care to provide Ada board packages. On the other side Ada compiler vendors have no time or desire to do it for thousands of boards for which you can barely find one customer or two. The bottom line, if students want to use modern software developing techniques (read Ada), they have to press on lazy ignorant profs. Board package in Ada is a perfect project for a university SW engineering department. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
From: anon on 14 Jul 2010 04:03 In <37da1783-b355-4d43-a9a8-7f0d4ba4da9c(a)t13g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, usenet(a)scriptoriumdesigns.com writes: >I'll just come out and say it - for a language that was designed for >as much for embedded applications as for anything, it seems to be >maddeningly difficult to actually get Ada on a modest embedded >platform. By modest I mean low-end 32 bits, no MMU. ARM7 or Cortex >Mx would be my first choice. I can be up and running on such a >platform with C and a tasking library in a day (Rowley Crossworks, >nice package). Why can't I do the same with Ada? Or rather, to avoid >making this about me, why can't an embedded programmer - student, >hobbyist or professional - who's heard about Ada and wants to give it >a spin, including hard-realtime concurrency, just do it? > >If Ada fans (I include myself) want to see Ada get more exposure, this >seems like not only a desirable step but a necessary one. I can run C >on a thousand such boards, and I can't (AFAIK) run Ada on one. > >Maybe this is all available, and I just haven't found out where. Then >that's a problem too, but I'll be happy to hear about it. > >All comments welcome. First, Ada was designed to be an application language, not only to be used for applications but Ada allows all programming including embedded. As for concurrency and real-time are built-in features of the Ada language from 83 to the current version. In a Ada shop you can write your code on a Host system, test and debug then recompile to the embedded target system. Of course, to do this the Host system must emulate the devices on targets system and the compiler must be able to generate the object module for that target system. But most of these Ada compiles that have is ability are out of the price range of students. But there are a few projects like for ARMs that uses GPL GNAT that are around, if you do a little research you should be able to find one or two.
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: Nominations for 2010 SIGAda awards Next: Simple hack to get $500 to your home. |