From: dk_ on 3 Aug 2005 05:30 Will upgrading from a PC2700 512MB RAM stick, to a PC3200 512 RAM stick make any noticable difference in performance. My computer is running with a Celeron D 340, 533 MHz FSB. -Dennis -- Dennis Kessler http://www.denniskessler.com/acupuncture
From: Yousuf Khan on 3 Aug 2005 08:12 dk_ wrote: > Will upgrading from a PC2700 512MB RAM stick, > to a PC3200 512 RAM stick make any noticable > difference in performance. > > My computer is running with a Celeron D 340, 533 MHz FSB. None. Yousuf Khan
From: dk_ on 3 Aug 2005 11:23 In article <Mw2Ie.4560$z91.469768(a)news20.bellglobal.com>, Yousuf Khan <bbbl67(a)ezrs.com> wrote: > dk_ wrote: > > Will upgrading from a PC2700 512MB RAM stick, > > to a PC3200 512 RAM stick make any noticable > > difference in performance. > > > > My computer is running with a Celeron D 340, 533 MHz FSB. > > None. > > Yousuf Khan Thank you for the quick reply! Why would the faster RAM make no difference in this case? Thanks. -Dennis -- Dennis Kessler http://www.denniskessler.com/acupuncture
From: YKhan on 3 Aug 2005 15:55 It's only a 15% difference in speed between PC2700 and PC3200. Sometimes you don't even notice a difference with a doubling of speed in some components, let alone 15%. You'll probably be able to demonstrate benchmarks which will prove it's faster, but you still won't notice it in your day-to-day use. There's two different measures of performance in most computer components: (1) bandwidth, and (2) latency. Bandwidth is akin to a topspeed, while latency is akin to an acceleration. In a car you feel its acceleration much more so than you feel its topspeed. Switching from PC2700 to 3200 is just an increase in topspeed, but not in acceleration.
From: dk_ on 3 Aug 2005 16:29 In article <1123098915.638307.151670(a)g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, "YKhan" <yjkhan(a)gmail.com> wrote: > It's only a 15% difference in speed between PC2700 and PC3200. > Sometimes you don't even notice a difference with a doubling of speed > in some components, let alone 15%. > > You'll probably be able to demonstrate benchmarks which will prove it's > faster, but you still won't notice it in your day-to-day use. There's > two different measures of performance in most computer components: (1) > bandwidth, and (2) latency. Bandwidth is akin to a topspeed, while > latency is akin to an acceleration. In a car you feel its acceleration > much more so than you feel its topspeed. Switching from PC2700 to 3200 > is just an increase in topspeed, but not in acceleration. > Very clear and very helpful! Thank you. Now here's my dilemma: ...my computer, (Celeron D 340, 533 MHz FSB), came with one 512 MB PC2700 stick with 8 modules on it. I also have a 512 MB PC3200 stick with 16 modules on it. I want to run the system with a total of 1024 MB's, and I understand that I should not mix x8 with x16 sticks, so I now need to puarchase either a 512 MB (x8) PC2700, or a 512 MB (x16) PC3200. (Currently the PC3200 is cheaper.) ....so, does the 533 MHz FSB actually use the faster RAM (PC3200), or does it top out with the PC2700??? Thanks. -Dennis -- Dennis Kessler http://denniskessler.com/acupuncture
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Prev: Q: How to correctly determine/set CAS latency in BIOS? Next: M766LRT MB with PIII600E Slot 1 |