From: knews4u2chew on
http://batr.org/view/052310.html

Doesn't look good unless you factor in the cost of oil gushing in the
ocean.
From: Michael Coburn on
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 12:16:36 -0700, knews4u2chew wrote:

> http://batr.org/view/052310.html
>
> Doesn't look good unless you factor in the cost of oil gushing in the
> ocean.

I agree!!! We should tax fossil fuels to cover the environmental damages
and the costs of middle east imperialism. No subsidies would be needed
for alternative energy if that were the case. The economics of fossil
fuels depends upon socialization of the externalities.

--
"Senate rules don't trump the Constitution" -- http://GreaterVoice.org/60
From: Ron McNulty on
Ok. so I live in the tiny windswept isles of New Zealand. Our demand
for energy continues to increase, so what are the options?

- Hydro - all the easy stuff has been developed, and getting
planning permission for new development is difficult and time-
consuming.
- Coal - Yes, we have plenty of "dirty" coal, but the emissions
trading scheme will make this uneconomic, let alone not "green". We
currently export most of it to China.
- Oil - Nothing local. It needs to be transported huge distances.
- Natural gas - known supplies have a few years to live. We might
find something new... but maybe we won't.
- Nuclear - huge startup costs, and concerns over waste and safety.
Not a starter at the moment.
- Wind - Moderate startup costs. Noisy, so it needs to be carefully
sited. Complements hydro nicely - can use hydro when the wind does not
blow. But in NZ, the wind blows most of the time. We are two tiny
islands in the middle of a very large ocean, and not too far from the
roaring forties belt.

Our choice is clear - wind may not be the way of the future, but it is
sure ticking the boxes right now.

Regards

Ron

From: Bret on
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 01:14:05 -0700 (PDT), Ron McNulty wrote:

> - Oil - Nothing local. It needs to be transported huge distances.

Huge offshore reserves.
From: Androcles on

"Ron McNulty" <rmcnulty(a)clear.net.nz> wrote in message
news:00d0a04d-4fa8-4767-8017-fb4b76823a4b(a)h37g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
| Ok. so I live in the tiny windswept isles of New Zealand. Our demand
| for energy continues to increase, so what are the options?
|
| - Hydro - all the easy stuff has been developed, and getting
| planning permission for new development is difficult and time-
| consuming.

When the lights go out the planning permissioners will have to
sign in the dark or they will go out as well. That problem will
solve itself.

| - Coal - Yes, we have plenty of "dirty" coal, but the emissions
| trading scheme will make this uneconomic, let alone not "green". We
| currently export most of it to China.

Bwahahahahahahahahaha!
Exporting dirty coal! There is only one planet, the same CO2
goes into the same atmosphere whether you burn it or China
does. Someone should shoot the greenies.

| - Oil - Nothing local. It needs to be transported huge distances.

You can always sit in the dark. I won't mind.

| - Natural gas - known supplies have a few years to live. We might
| find something new... but maybe we won't.

You can always sit in the dark. I won't mind.

| - Nuclear - huge startup costs, and concerns over waste and safety.
| Not a starter at the moment.

You can always sit in the dark. I won't mind.


| - Wind - Moderate startup costs. Noisy, so it needs to be carefully
| sited. Complements hydro nicely - can use hydro when the wind does not
| blow. But in NZ, the wind blows most of the time. We are two tiny
| islands in the middle of a very large ocean, and not too far from the
| roaring forties belt.
|
| Our choice is clear - wind may not be the way of the future, but it is
| sure ticking the boxes right now.
|
| Regards
|
| Ron

You left out wave power and tidal power. How much water flows in
Cook Straight twice a day?
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/397106